<![CDATA[1991 Best Supporting Actor- Why was it so bad?]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Movie Awards

A-Town8814 — 5 years ago(June 13, 2020 07:35 PM)

The nominees were:
Tommy Lee Jones, JFK
Harvey Keitel, Bugsy
Ben Kingsley, Bugsy
Michael Lerner, Barton Fink
Jack Palance, City Slickers
Seriously, what a crappy set of nominees. Where's Ted Levine in Silence Of The Lambs? John Goodman in Barton Fink? Joe Pesci or Donald Sutherland in JFK?

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/2854/1991-best-supporting-actor-why-was-it-so-badRSS for NodeThu, 14 May 2026 08:24:34 GMTSat, 11 Apr 2026 04:14:13 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to 1991 Best Supporting Actor- Why was it so bad? on Sat, 11 Apr 2026 04:14:14 GMT]]>LorqVonRay1999 — 3 months ago(December 28, 2025 12:41 AM)

I didn't think Bugsy was very good.
JFK is one of the best films of the 90s.
But I am glad Palance won it for City Slickers.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/18465https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/18465Sat, 11 Apr 2026 04:14:14 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 1991 Best Supporting Actor- Why was it so bad? on Sat, 11 Apr 2026 04:14:14 GMT]]>ToastedCheese — 2 years ago(February 18, 2024 10:42 PM)

Bugsy really wasn’t worth the hype it got at the time. It was a Beatty plug.
Norman! What did you put in my tea?

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/18464https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/18464Sat, 11 Apr 2026 04:14:14 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 1991 Best Supporting Actor- Why was it so bad? on Sat, 11 Apr 2026 04:14:14 GMT]]>Whennow — 2 years ago(February 18, 2024 10:36 PM)

I’m not sure if Hopkins initially being seen as supporting blocked Ted Levine from getting his own momentum
Academy loved seeing Ben Kingsley so opposite Gandhi
In 1991 Keitel was also in Thelma and Louise

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/18463https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/18463Sat, 11 Apr 2026 04:14:14 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 1991 Best Supporting Actor- Why was it so bad? on Sat, 11 Apr 2026 04:14:14 GMT]]>RodgeK — 2 years ago(February 01, 2024 05:18 AM)

They are all great actors. What actors do you think should have been nominated?

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/18462https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/18462Sat, 11 Apr 2026 04:14:14 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 1991 Best Supporting Actor- Why was it so bad? on Sat, 11 Apr 2026 04:14:14 GMT]]>A-Town8814 — 2 years ago(January 30, 2024 05:57 AM)

Abysmal lineup. Michael Lerner is the only deserving performance out of them.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/18461https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/18461Sat, 11 Apr 2026 04:14:14 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 1991 Best Supporting Actor- Why was it so bad? on Sat, 11 Apr 2026 04:14:13 GMT]]>MovieManCin2 — 5 years ago(June 13, 2020 09:27 PM)

That's typical of the scumbag pinheads in Hollyweird.
MAGA! FAFO! 😎 Schrodinger's Cat walks into a bar, and doesn't. 😎 Dumbocraps: evil people who celebrate murder. 😠

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/18460https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/18460Sat, 11 Apr 2026 04:14:13 GMT