<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Should award shows not have…]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Theater Awards</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDB_Vits</strong> — <em>11 years ago(January 25, 2015 10:31 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">nominees? Just winners instead? I mean, what's the real point? To show who got close to winning, like they do in sports? If so, shouldn't the nominees be ranked?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/30651/should-award-shows-not-have</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 01:15:11 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/30651.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 20:21:21 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Should award shows not have… on Sat, 11 Apr 2026 20:21:22 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>michaeldinan</strong> — <em>9 years ago(July 18, 2016 10:18 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Nominees are saying "here are the best of the year."</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/325526</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/325526</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 20:21:22 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>