This message has been deleted.

What if I have none of the above?
In that case I will just flick my Bic with one hand and stroke my dick with the other!
"Please vote to preserve the unique character of Warren…" - Robert Duvall

Coal is more efficient than wood, which turns women on.
My password is password

This message has been deleted.

No no, I mean the pollution that is created when you burn wood. Lots of bad stuff floats out of it in the smoke. comparable to fossil fuels
Stop.

i'm not wrong.

Snort another line.
Ho Ho Ho

well before we will run out of forests, we mostly likely will run out of life, bc already the loss of 50% (or was it even 30%) of our current forest stand worldwide is going to cause a complete and irredeemable climate collapse. the air will heat up tremendously, with less trees compensating and balancing out temperatures, we will run out of breathable air, less rain will cause droughts worldwide obviously which will have crop failures and harvest losses as consequences, also bc the soil is already going to be lost with no trees around anymore, which will inevitably cause hunger catastrophes, not only in Africa, Southeast Asia and South America, but also here in the Global North. and so on and on and on… so before we run out of forests entirely, humanity will already have ceased to exist, and humans will be extinct long before the last tree on Earth dies.
humans are such losers.

Wood is renewable so technically better for the environment, but there isn't enough wood on the planet to support our energy needs. We'd run out of forests fast.
My password is password

we are almost out of fossil fuels and there will be no more supplies one day anymore obviously which makes your question obsolete. the smoke that is produced from burning wood is highly carcinogenic, so not a great substitute once fossil fuels won't be no more. until that day comes tho, the Earth will be in full global warming mode anyway, so heating is gonna become redundant. yada yada yada
tl;dr your question is dumb.