<![CDATA[OT: 4K tvs are fcking sweet.]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Video Games

SolarisTheOne — 9 years ago(October 10, 2016 03:21 PM)

Got to really soak on in over the weekend since my brother has one and I was visiting him.
Everything looks so sharp and real and more lifelike. Hard to explain. It bumps up the quality of everything. Man, I need one!
4k is the real deal.
We all have it coming Kid

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/35476/ot-4k-tvs-are-fcking-sweetRSS for NodeFri, 15 May 2026 04:31:25 GMTSun, 12 Apr 2026 00:18:11 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to OT: 4K tvs are fcking sweet. on Sun, 12 Apr 2026 00:18:16 GMT]]>HereComesMadness — 9 years ago(October 10, 2016 10:13 PM)

Having a 4k is awesome, great to have a box that takes advantage of it too. I'm glad they got pretty affordable fast.
No one is on my ignore list, because I'm not a pussy
Flagging is for cowards

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/371120https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/371120Sun, 12 Apr 2026 00:18:16 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to OT: 4K tvs are fcking sweet. on Sun, 12 Apr 2026 00:18:16 GMT]]>Harry_Skywalker — 9 years ago(October 10, 2016 08:20 PM)

That's because I love snow!!!
I always tell the truth, even when I lie.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/371119https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/371119Sun, 12 Apr 2026 00:18:16 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to OT: 4K tvs are fcking sweet. on Sun, 12 Apr 2026 00:18:15 GMT]]>NostradamACE — 9 years ago(October 10, 2016 08:18 PM)

My current HDTV got spoiled.
That's why you refrigerate your TV's!!!
My Signature changes everyday!

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/371118https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/371118Sun, 12 Apr 2026 00:18:15 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to OT: 4K tvs are fcking sweet. on Sun, 12 Apr 2026 00:18:15 GMT]]>Harry_Skywalker — 9 years ago(October 10, 2016 07:58 PM)

The main thing that makes all the difference is HDR, not exactly 4K.
What's your TV?
I'm gonna buy a new one. My current HDTV got spoiled.
I always tell the truth, even when I lie.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/371117https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/371117Sun, 12 Apr 2026 00:18:15 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to OT: 4K tvs are fcking sweet. on Sun, 12 Apr 2026 00:18:15 GMT]]>Flaccid_Sssnake — 9 years ago(October 10, 2016 04:39 PM)

When I can get a 65 inch OLED for 1500 bucks I'll pull the trigger.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/371116https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/371116Sun, 12 Apr 2026 00:18:15 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to OT: 4K tvs are fcking sweet. on Sun, 12 Apr 2026 00:18:14 GMT]]>magus-21 — 9 years ago(October 10, 2016 04:15 PM)

I dunno about now, but I was much more impressed by OLED TVs. Maybe 4K TVs have improved since then, though.
People call me a cynic. I call myself a realist.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/371115https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/371115Sun, 12 Apr 2026 00:18:14 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to OT: 4K tvs are fcking sweet. on Sun, 12 Apr 2026 00:18:14 GMT]]>Zuko_Reborn — 9 years ago(October 10, 2016 04:59 PM)

Work mostly and this board has been overly negative for too long but some enthusiasm got me to post again.
"If you say I have a motive then it's to punish all of you who brought pain to my friends!"- Zidane

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/371114https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/371114Sun, 12 Apr 2026 00:18:14 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to OT: 4K tvs are fcking sweet. on Sun, 12 Apr 2026 00:18:14 GMT]]>SolarisTheOne — 9 years ago(October 10, 2016 04:13 PM)

Where have you been Zuko?
We all have it coming Kid

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/371113https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/371113Sun, 12 Apr 2026 00:18:14 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to OT: 4K tvs are fcking sweet. on Sun, 12 Apr 2026 00:18:13 GMT]]>Zuko_Reborn — 9 years ago(October 10, 2016 04:04 PM)

I have to say that I'm impressed with my 4K TV. It's awesome.
"If you say I have a motive then it's to punish all of you who brought pain to my friends!"- Zidane

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/371112https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/371112Sun, 12 Apr 2026 00:18:13 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to OT: 4K tvs are fcking sweet. on Sun, 12 Apr 2026 00:18:13 GMT]]>Koolguy345678 — 9 years ago(October 10, 2016 04:52 PM)

I said 1080i. I didn't post a picture of your wife
You do not take down a Legend

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/371111https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/371111Sun, 12 Apr 2026 00:18:13 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to OT: 4K tvs are fcking sweet. on Sun, 12 Apr 2026 00:18:13 GMT]]>!!!deleted!!! (24186271) — 9 years ago(October 10, 2016 04:02 PM)

Nothing wrong with 1080i
vomit

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/371110https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/371110Sun, 12 Apr 2026 00:18:13 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to OT: 4K tvs are fcking sweet. on Sun, 12 Apr 2026 00:18:13 GMT]]>Koolguy345678 — 9 years ago(October 10, 2016 03:40 PM)

They said the same thing about color television way back when. It's all a gimmick to get you to fork over more cash. Nothing wrong with 1080i, and besidesyour TV is already obsolete. 8k is where it's at.
http://www.gottabemobile.com/2016/01/08/8k-tv-from-samsung-lg-show-off-the-future-of-tv/
You do not take down a Legend

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/371109https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/371109Sun, 12 Apr 2026 00:18:13 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to OT: 4K tvs are fcking sweet. on Sun, 12 Apr 2026 00:18:12 GMT]]>Harry_Skywalker — 9 years ago(October 10, 2016 08:35 PM)

Totally correct. Bingo!
I always tell the truth, even when I lie.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/371108https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/371108Sun, 12 Apr 2026 00:18:12 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to OT: 4K tvs are fcking sweet. on Sun, 12 Apr 2026 00:18:12 GMT]]>Kreegor — 9 years ago(October 10, 2016 08:33 PM)

If it's under 60", then 1080 is all you need (so long as it also has all the bells and whistles like HDR).
www.400monkeys.com/God/

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/371107https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/371107Sun, 12 Apr 2026 00:18:12 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to OT: 4K tvs are fcking sweet. on Sun, 12 Apr 2026 00:18:12 GMT]]>Yoss_and_the_Pilfered_Peaches — 9 years ago(October 10, 2016 03:44 PM)

Well, I doubt you'll find one with a lower resolution that has these features as I've read that they don't make them, so it's not like there's much of a choice if you want a TV with more vibrant colours. You'll technically get a clearer image with 4K, since it has four times the pixels, but, apparently, your eyes can't really perceive much of a difference since the pixels are just too small at that point, unless the TV is huge and you're sitting unusually close to it. Diminishing returns in effect.
I am on fire, but an extinguisher is not required

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/371106https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/371106Sun, 12 Apr 2026 00:18:12 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to OT: 4K tvs are fcking sweet. on Sun, 12 Apr 2026 00:18:11 GMT]]>SolarisTheOne — 9 years ago(October 10, 2016 03:35 PM)

So technically you dont need 4k to have that extra picture fidelity? Cause Ive never seen a tv look so crystal clear.
We all have it coming Kid

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/371105https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/371105Sun, 12 Apr 2026 00:18:11 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to OT: 4K tvs are fcking sweet. on Sun, 12 Apr 2026 00:18:11 GMT]]>Yoss_and_the_Pilfered_Peaches — 9 years ago(October 10, 2016 03:29 PM)

As far as I know, it's not actually the resolution that makes the difference (and there's the popular chart that shows you won't really be able to see a difference in terms of resolution on a TV anyway), but all the other fancy post processing thingamajig. Wide colour gamut, HDR, what have you.
I am on fire, but an extinguisher is not required

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/371104https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/371104Sun, 12 Apr 2026 00:18:11 GMT