<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Great special effects- I&#x27;m glad they didn&#x27;t use CGI for the robots]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — General Discussion</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>clivy</strong> — <em>10 years ago(June 16, 2015 04:00 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">My husband and I were very impressed by this movie. I was very happy to see that the robots were not CGI. So many movies now just use paint the characters in later with CGI- what a pleasant surpise to see the robots moving like machines because they were machines!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/37660/great-special-effects-i-m-glad-they-didn-t-use-cgi-for-the-robots</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 15:35:09 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/37660.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 02:41:35 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Great special effects- I&#x27;m glad they didn&#x27;t use CGI for the robots on Sun, 12 Apr 2026 02:41:35 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Woodyanders</strong> — <em>3 weeks ago(March 09, 2026 11:50 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">The practical effects for the robots were quite good and convincing.<br />
You've seen Guy Standeven in something because the man was in everything.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/397326</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/397326</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 02:41:35 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>