OK, let's see.
For tons of movie reviews, 60+ genre lists, best of the year lists, and other content, check out:
www.thecineviewer.com

The Range of Character just wasnt there,
Now the Talented..
Without strife, your victory has no meaning.
Without strife, you do not advance.
Without strife, there is only stagnation.

He wasn't that bad. In Bourne films, he was rather a machine; I would've understood if that was confirmed. Since it was not, they sucked, so was his performance.
For tons of movie reviews, 60+ genre lists, best of the year lists, and other content, check out:
www.thecineviewer.com

I didnt think it was that way back.
Damon’s Still, lifeless hollow lik Performance was Dull.
Without strife, your victory has no meaning.
Without strife, you do not advance.
Without strife, there is only stagnation.

In the 30's or 40's? Nah…not believable. Casting somebody else would've been less of a distraction. Yeah, it was a slow movie overall anyway.
For tons of movie reviews, 60+ genre lists, best of the year lists, and other content, check out:
www.thecineviewer.com

I did like it,
But I didnt give it that high a rating,
Lik a 5.
I did lik the Jolie angle, there are so many Hot Wives,
That are just so there just for Status,
Nothing else.
Without strife, your victory has no meaning.
Without strife, you do not advance.
Without strife, there is only stagnation.

I went against the grain and gave that rating. I can see why most people didn't like it.
For tons of movie reviews, 60+ genre lists, best of the year lists, and other content, check out:
www.thecineviewer.com

Damn,
I cant believe you gave it a 7.
Without strife, your victory has no meaning.
Without strife, you do not advance.
Without strife, there is only stagnation.