<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Good but not Hitchcock good]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — General Discussion</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>cartesianthought</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 08, 2017 05:43 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Mystery plot is very basic by modern standards.  Some beautiful shots and good directing.  Pretty women.  A lead actor who is a handsome sexy mix between a smooth criminal and a block of wood.  It ticks the boxes.  Despite being a movie about crime, it doesn't have anywhere near the sense of danger that movies like Psycho and Vertigo had.<br />
I'm settled somewhere between a 7 and an 8, a little closer toward 7.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/38713/good-but-not-hitchcock-good</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 15:27:49 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/38713.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 03:39:18 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Good but not Hitchcock good on Sun, 12 Apr 2026 03:39:19 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>preachcaleb</strong> — <em>2 months ago(January 26, 2026 09:38 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Can't argue with too much there. I do agree that it doesn't have quite the sense of danger as other Hitchcock films do, but I took this more as an adventure rather than a thriller.<br />
So many stories, so little time.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/407701</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/407701</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 03:39:19 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Good but not Hitchcock good on Sun, 12 Apr 2026 03:39:19 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Cult_of_Kibner</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 30, 2017 04:56 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">That's a good way to put it. If I didn't know otherwise I don't think I would have guessed Hitchcock was the director.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/407700</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/407700</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 03:39:19 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Good but not Hitchcock good on Sun, 12 Apr 2026 03:39:19 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>louiseculmer</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 22, 2017 02:47 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">it's my favourite hitchcock film.  but I'm not a big fan of horror, films like Vertigo and Psycho aren't my cup of tea.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/407699</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/407699</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 03:39:19 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Good but not Hitchcock good on Sun, 12 Apr 2026 03:39:19 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/407698</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/407698</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 03:39:19 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>