<![CDATA[https://thecineviewer.com/backtothefutureiii.html]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — General Discussion

JohnnyBoy — 2 months ago(January 19, 2026 12:56 AM)

https://thecineviewer.com/backtothefutureiii.html
For tons of movie reviews, 60+ genre lists, best of the year lists, and other content, check out:
www.thecineviewer.com

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/38832/https-thecineviewer-com-backtothefutureiii-htmlRSS for NodeTue, 12 May 2026 16:08:23 GMTSun, 12 Apr 2026 03:44:34 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to https://thecineviewer.com/backtothefutureiii.html on Sun, 12 Apr 2026 03:44:35 GMT]]>JohnnyBoy — 2 months ago(January 20, 2026 12:16 AM)

I've never liked the second but will accept it. 1st and 3rd are like stand alone films with enough creativity to boot.
For tons of movie reviews, 60+ genre lists, best of the year lists, and other content, check out:
www.thecineviewer.com

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/408618https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/408618Sun, 12 Apr 2026 03:44:35 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to https://thecineviewer.com/backtothefutureiii.html on Sun, 12 Apr 2026 03:44:34 GMT]]>WarrenPeace — 2 months ago(January 19, 2026 08:24 PM)

I agree with your second review.
It's a fun mix of the Western movie genre meets a sci fi comedy.
(Although the manure joke is getting old at this point. And the cameo by ZZ Top, a hot band at the time, is a hoot with the spinning instruments doesn't matter.)
The middle one, IMO, is pretty much forgotten compared to 1 and 3.
"Please vote to preserve the unique character of Warren…" - Robert Duvall

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/408617https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/408617Sun, 12 Apr 2026 03:44:34 GMT