Which Reinserts my Point that Harrison lifted it.
The Sequel was good too!
I Think switching the white likable guy for a ngr,
Turned people off!
Without strife, your victory has no meaning.
Without strife, you do not advance.
Without strife, there is only stagnation.

No nominations for that sequel, tho

well at least he got to do a peter pan right there off of that damn right there….BOOM. That has to be worth something to him.

That's true.
For tons of movie reviews, 60+ genre lists, best of the year lists, and other content, check out:
www.thecineviewer.com

Havent seen that one.
Just Read Ford Had More Screen time,
Ford Was 1st Billing.
If you take out Tommy Lee out of this movie,
It still Sells.
If you take out Ford. No One will go See it!
Without strife, your victory has no meaning.
Without strife, you do not advance.
Without strife, there is only stagnation.

So following your logic, that will mean the little kid in The Golden Child is the lead, not Eddie Murphy.
For tons of movie reviews, 60+ genre lists, best of the year lists, and other content, check out:
www.thecineviewer.com

Screen time,
Doesnt Mean Lead.
The Main attraction and the One who’s story Revolved around of Was Ford.
Without strife, your victory has no meaning.
Without strife, you do not advance.
Without strife, there is only stagnation.

Pretty sure, Tommy Lee Jones had much more screen time than Harrison Ford.
For tons of movie reviews, 60+ genre lists, best of the year lists, and other content, check out:
www.thecineviewer.com

In the Grand scheme of the Story,
He is supporting Harrison,
In every Form.
Harrison is the Fugitive, and has zero support while, Tommy Lee is Full of Support.
Without strife, your victory has no meaning.
Without strife, you do not advance.
Without strife, there is only stagnation.

Yeah, he was. It was pretty equal between Harrison Ford and Tommy Lee Jones. You see, those around Tommy Lee Jones are supporting people, and who does Tommy Lee Jones support? Answer: nobody. That makes him a leader.
For tons of movie reviews, 60+ genre lists, best of the year lists, and other content, check out:
www.thecineviewer.com

Tommy Lee wasnt Lead
Without strife, your victory has no meaning.
Without strife, you do not advance.
Without strife, there is only stagnation.

DA ONLY THING I REMEMBER AND ANYONE REMEMBER OF THIS MOVIE IS FORD!
Without strife, your victory has no meaning.
Without strife, you do not advance.
Without strife, there is only stagnation.

Harrison is Harrison. Tommy Lee Jones elevated himself. I believe this is the movie that helped him enter the national consciousness. Before then, he wasn't that well known.
For tons of movie reviews, 60+ genre lists, best of the year lists, and other content, check out:
www.thecineviewer.com

He was good,
but Tommy Lee Jones was better…far far far better.
No he wasn't. He was great, but not "far better" than Ford. Jones yelled the whole movie. Ford had to convey all kinds of emotion.

He was good, but Tommy Lee Jones was better…far far far better. However, that was a leading role for both. The Academy screwed it up. Overall, Liam Neeson got robbed and was the true winner.
https://thecineviewer.com/FilmsOf1993.html
For tons of movie reviews, 60+ genre lists, best of the year lists, and other content, check out:
www.thecineviewer.com