<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Guns will never be banned]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Everything Else</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>Soul_Venom</strong> — <em>6 months ago(October 03, 2025 04:08 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Me<br />
If the Government attempted to ban guns and enlist the police &amp; military to confiscate civilian weapons — what would happen &amp; who would win?<br />
ChatGPT:<br />
Verdict (short):<br />
On balance in a realistic, highly polarized scenario, I judge the outcome ≈65% civilians / 35% military (civilian-favored). That is: civilians would have a modest but meaningful advantage unless political leadership, governors, and senior commanders succeed quickly in preventing defections, securing logistics, and avoiding heavy-handed tactics that radicalize large numbers of people.<br />
Why — the key, checkable reasons<br />
Civilian small arms vastly outnumber military small arms.<br />
Civilian-held firearms in the United States number in the hundreds of millions; that gives a huge distributed stock of small arms and ammunition across the population. Importantly, many civilian weapons are not inferior or primitive — a substantial portion are modern, well-maintained, and often customized with high-quality optics, match-grade barrels, and aftermarket upgrades. In many practical use-cases civilians possess rifles and precision firearms that meet or exceed basic service-issue small arms in accuracy and capability, giving them not just numbers but higher per-weapon effectiveness for certain tasks. This combination of distribution and quality is a fundamental advantage in a decentralized fight focused on rifles and pistols.Source: Small Arms Survey<br />
Large veteran population provides experienced cadre.<br />
The U.S. has tens of millions of veterans. Even a modest fraction of veterans acting as instructors, leaders, or unit-builders dramatically improves the battlefield effectiveness of otherwise unorganized civilians. That “cadre” effect multiplies local tactical competence and unit cohesion.Source: <a href="http://Census.gov" rel="nofollow ugc">Census.gov</a><br />
Many civilian firearms and setups are highly capable, often customized.<br />
The civilian market contains a huge variety of firearms — from hunting rifles to match-grade precision rifles and militarized-style semi-autos — and widespread availability of high-quality optics and customizations. That means many individual civilian weapons can be more capable for certain tasks than basic service-issue small arms built primarily for rugged reliability. (Civilian market and military-issue designs overlap, and civilians frequently buy match-grade or customized equipment.)Source: National Defense Magazine<br />
Legal and political limits slow rapid national militarization.<br />
U.S. law and policy (e.g., Posse Comitatus-type constraints and political/legal hurdles to invoking domestic authorities) make immediate, wholesale use of active-duty forces for civilian law enforcement legally and politically fraught. Senior defense officials have publicly warned against routine domestic deployment of active-duty troops. That creates friction and delay at the moment when rapid, decisive action would matter most.Source: <a href="http://Congress.gov" rel="nofollow ugc">Congress.gov</a><br />
A non-trivial portion of forces and high-value assets are forward-deployed.<br />
The U.S. maintains significant overseas deployments; moving large formations or high-value assets back to the homeland and reconstituting them for domestic operations takes time. That gives organized insurgent elements a window to seize initiative, harass logistics, and consolidate local advantages.Source: Geographical reporting<br />
Heavy ordnance is expensive, limited, and politically risky to use against dispersed fighters.<br />
The military’s decisive tools (air strikes, large bombs, precision munitions) are finite, costly, and best used against massed or hardened targets. Using such weapons against widely dispersed, small-arms fighters is often tactically inefficient and highly likely to produce civilian collateral damage — which in turn fuels recruitment into the resistance and robs the government of legitimacy. Recent public reporting has also noted strains and ramp-ups in munitions production after high-consumption operations.Source: National Defense Magazine<br />
Defections and “soft” non-compliance are force multipliers.<br />
Even modest rates of hard defection (small groups or crews taking weapons/equipment) or widespread soft refusal (slow-rolling orders, refusal to mobilize) have outsized operational effects: they remove trained personnel from the government side, add trained people to the insurgent side, allow seizure of materiel, and force the government to reassign many troops to guard logistics and bases. Those nonlinear effects can flip local superiority quickly.<br />
Fixed-node and logistics vulnerabilities multiply friction.<br />
Fuel depots, munitions storage, comms nodes, convoys and supply lines are asymmetric pressure points for a decentralized opponent. Repeated successful strikes or sabotage against logistics degrade the military’s ability to concentrate and sustain force long before sheer numbers run out.<br />
Radicalization feedback is real and fast.<br />
Visible, heavy-handed operations that produce civilian casualties (especially in urban or populated areas) tend to drive large numbers of previously n</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/45733/guns-will-never-be-banned</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 11:38:06 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/45733.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 10:49:36 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Guns will never be banned on Sun, 12 Apr 2026 10:49:47 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>/.ㅤ</strong> — <em>6 months ago(October 04, 2025 06:36 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Go to the nearest police station pull an inanimate object.<br />
That sounds pretty stupid, bruh<br />
My password is password.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/479456</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/479456</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 10:49:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Guns will never be banned on Sun, 12 Apr 2026 10:49:46 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>/.ㅤ</strong> — <em>6 months ago(October 04, 2025 05:57 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">lulz he edited it what a jackass loser<br />
My password is password.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/479455</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/479455</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 10:49:46 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Guns will never be banned on Sun, 12 Apr 2026 10:49:46 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>/.ㅤ</strong> — <em>6 months ago(October 04, 2025 05:22 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Unlike you i don't believe in magic. You have made it clear that you are the sort of ****ing idiot that blames<br />
inaminate<br />
objects for crimes.<br />
*inanimate<br />
My password is password.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/479454</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/479454</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 10:49:46 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Guns will never be banned on Sun, 12 Apr 2026 10:49:45 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Soul_Venom</strong> — <em>6 months ago(October 04, 2025 05:11 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Unlike you i don't believe in magic. You have made it clear that you are the sort of ****ing idiot that blames inanimate objects for crimes. Or at least you claim to online. Online you feel safe to play stupid.<br />
Try the same logic in real life. Go to the nearest police station pull a gun and open fire. Don't worry, you'll be fine. After all, by your logic it is not you shooting at cops, it was the gun. I am sure they will understand and allow you to return home afterwards.<br />
Trump is still your President.  Charlie Kirk still Wins!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/479453</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/479453</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 10:49:45 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Guns will never be banned on Sun, 12 Apr 2026 10:49:45 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>/.ㅤ</strong> — <em>6 months ago(October 04, 2025 05:03 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Nope, wrong again dipshit.<br />
Kirk was killed by a bullet to the neck.<br />
My password is password.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/479452</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/479452</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 10:49:45 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Guns will never be banned on Sun, 12 Apr 2026 10:49:45 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Soul_Venom</strong> — <em>6 months ago(October 04, 2025 04:50 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">No. It is you free speech hating leftists with your 'speech is violence' idealogy.<br />
Trump is still your President.  Charlie Kirk still Wins!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/479451</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/479451</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 10:49:45 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Guns will never be banned on Sun, 12 Apr 2026 10:49:44 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>/.ㅤ</strong> — <em>6 months ago(October 04, 2025 09:16 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">You gun nuts are why Charlie Kirk is dead. Shame on you!<br />
My password is password.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/479450</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/479450</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 10:49:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Guns will never be banned on Sun, 12 Apr 2026 10:49:44 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Soul_Venom</strong> — <em>6 months ago(October 04, 2025 04:48 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Let's get the extent of your retardation mapped out.<br />
Is it that you deny that ANYONE wants to ban all guns?<br />
Or is it that you refuse to admit that such people are in government?<br />
Trump is still your President.  Charlie Kirk still Wins!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/479449</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/479449</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 10:49:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Guns will never be banned on Sun, 12 Apr 2026 10:49:43 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>She's Got Marty Feldman Eyes</strong> — <em>6 months ago(October 04, 2025 04:34 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Horse<br />
Shit</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/479448</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/479448</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 10:49:43 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Guns will never be banned on Sun, 12 Apr 2026 10:49:43 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Soul_Venom</strong> — <em>6 months ago(October 04, 2025 02:59 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Trying to inflict a death of 1000 cuts vs just chopping off someones head is still an attempt to inflict death. Their goal was eventually banning all guns. That is why they refuse to work with conservatives. Conservatives are trying to curb unnecessary deaths. They just want guns banned outright. At least folks like warren are honest about it. It is one of his only redeeming qualities. He has some stupendously stupid ideas but he holds them honestly.<br />
Trump is still your President.  Charlie Kirk still Wins!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/479447</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/479447</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 10:49:43 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Guns will never be banned on Sun, 12 Apr 2026 10:49:43 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>She's Got Marty Feldman Eyes</strong> — <em>6 months ago(October 04, 2025 02:49 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">As I stated…NO ONE HAS TRIED TO FULLY BAN FIREARMS!<br />
That was a lot of work you put in to solidify my argument…thanx<br />
<img src="https://filmglance.com/discuss/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f642.png?v=8570fb93240" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--slightly_smiling_face" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=":slightly_smiling_face:" alt="🙂" /><img src="https://filmglance.com/discuss/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f44d.png?v=8570fb93240" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--+1" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=":+1:" alt="👍" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/479446</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/479446</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 10:49:43 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Guns will never be banned on Sun, 12 Apr 2026 10:49:42 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Soul_Venom</strong> — <em>6 months ago(October 03, 2025 11:52 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I’ve split American politicians into two groups. Here is a short list:<br />
(A) Politicians who explicitly backed confiscation / mandatory buybacks (or said they would “take” certain guns).<br />
(B) Politicians who have called for bans (usually on “assault”-style semiautomatic rifles, high‑capacity magazines, imports, etc.).<br />
I cite sources for each name (these are public statements, debate lines, press releases, or campaign positions).<br />
A — Explicit confiscation / mandatory buybacks (examples)<br />
Beto O’Rourke — “Hell yes, we’re going to take your AR‑15, your AK‑47” and proposed a mandatory national buyback for assault weapons.<br />
TIME<br />
+1<br />
Eric Swalwell — proposed banning and buying back “every single assault weapon in America” in his 2020 campaign messaging (advocated mandatory buyback and stronger enforcement).<br />
Representative Swalwell<br />
+1<br />
Cory Booker — voiced strong support for banning assault weapons and has backed mandatory buyback ideas in speeches/interviews.<br />
YouTube<br />
+1<br />
Julián Castro — supported a renewed assault weapons ban and a buyback/registration approach as part of his 2020 platform.<br />
The Texas Tribune<br />
+1<br />
B — Politicians who have called for bans on assault weapons, high‑capacity magazines, imports, or similar restrictions<br />
(These statements range from campaign policy pages and debate lines to floor speeches — many specify assault‑style weapons rather than “all guns”.)<br />
Joe Biden — pledged an assault‑weapons ban and a national buyback program during his 2020 campaign and has long supported stricter limits on assault‑style weapons.<br />
Axios<br />
+1<br />
Elizabeth Warren — repeatedly called on Congress to reinstate an assault‑weapons ban.<br />
U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren<br />
+1<br />
Kamala Harris — has supported executive actions and bans on certain imports/assault weapons as part of her gun‑safety platform (note: some internet claims about her saying she’d “send police to confiscate” have been debunked — her expressed policy positions focus on bans, restrictions, and enforcement).<br />
ABC News<br />
+1<br />
Nancy Pelosi — long‑time supporter of reinstating an assault weapons ban; the House under Pelosi has passed assault‑weapons restriction measures.<br />
Representative Nancy Pelosi<br />
+1<br />
Pete Buttigieg — supported banning “military‑style” assault weapons as a policy position (though he argued against mandatory buybacks).<br />
On The Issues<br />
+1<br />
Alexandria Ocasio‑Cortez (AOC) — called for banning semiautomatic weapons and high‑capacity magazines in her gun‑violence proposals.<br />
Newsweek<br />
+1<br />
Bernie Sanders — has a record of supporting some assault‑weapons restrictions (and has supported stricter gun laws in recent years; his earlier votes are more complicated).<br />
PolitiFact<br />
Gavin Newsom (Governor of California) — has urged bans on assault weapons and even pushed for a constitutional amendment on gun control in public statements as California governor.<br />
Governor of California<br />
+1<br />
Dianne Feinstein — long‑time sponsor/author of federal assault‑weapons limitation legislation (famously authored the 1994 AWB).<br />
<a href="http://Congress.gov" rel="nofollow ugc">Congress.gov</a><br />
Chuck Schumer — Democratic leader who has supported reinstating an assault‑weapons ban and other federal restrictions at times; has been involved in floor strategy on such measures.<br />
Axios<br />
+1<br />
Chris Murphy — vocal Senate advocate for stricter gun laws including limitations on assault weapons and stronger federal action. (See numerous floor speeches and proposals.)<br />
<a href="http://Congress.gov" rel="nofollow ugc">Congress.gov</a><br />
All of them would take the guns if they thought they could. Just like warren wouldn't hesitate to snap his fingers if he thought it would magic away all the guns.<br />
Trump is still your President.  Charlie Kirk still Wins!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/479445</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/479445</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 10:49:42 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Guns will never be banned on Sun, 12 Apr 2026 10:49:42 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>She's Got Marty Feldman Eyes</strong> — <em>6 months ago(October 03, 2025 03:19 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Show me one serious attempt of anyone to try to fully ban firearms in America…you can't because it has never and will never happen.<br />
The notion is a ludicrous fantasy presented by paranoid nuttballs who have nothing better to concern themselves with.<br />
Here's what you false AI god has to say…<br />
AI Overview<br />
+12<br />
Legislation proposing a<br />
total ban on all firearms in America has not been introduced in Congress.<br />
The Second Amendment right to bear arms and a long history of gun ownership would make such a proposal<br />
politically unviable<br />
and almost certainly<br />
unconstitutional<br />
.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/479444</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/479444</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 10:49:42 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Guns will never be banned on Sun, 12 Apr 2026 10:49:41 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Soul_Venom</strong> — <em>6 months ago(October 03, 2025 03:00 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">What? That the lefts attempts to ban guns was futile?<br />
I didn't write the conclusion. The AI did that.<br />
Trump is still your President.  Charlie Kirk still Wins!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/479443</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/479443</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 10:49:41 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Guns will never be banned on Sun, 12 Apr 2026 10:49:41 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>She's Got Marty Feldman Eyes</strong> — <em>6 months ago(October 03, 2025 01:46 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">You took that long to write the most obvious thing in the ****in world</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/479442</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/479442</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 10:49:41 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Guns will never be banned on Sun, 12 Apr 2026 10:49:41 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Soul_Venom</strong> — <em>6 months ago(October 03, 2025 03:04 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Do you have any legitimate questions or do you simply intend to to rage bait because i posted an invincible argument on the futility of attempts by the left to ban guns?<br />
I know rage is how you leftoids usually respond when told "No." It is the toddler response I have come to expect from a group that cant deal with not getting their own way.<br />
Trump is still your President.  Charlie Kirk still Wins!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/479441</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/479441</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 10:49:41 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Guns will never be banned on Sun, 12 Apr 2026 10:49:40 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>$top</strong> — <em>6 months ago(October 03, 2025 01:46 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Are you having a tantrum?<br />
<a href="https://voca.ro/1bwJIF2bmFi0" rel="nofollow ugc">https://voca.ro/1bwJIF2bmFi0</a><br />
Miley aka shitfingers</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/479440</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/479440</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 10:49:40 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Guns will never be banned on Sun, 12 Apr 2026 10:49:40 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>$top</strong> — <em>6 months ago(October 03, 2025 01:46 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Judging by his post it is 🤏<br />
<a href="https://voca.ro/1bwJIF2bmFi0" rel="nofollow ugc">https://voca.ro/1bwJIF2bmFi0</a><br />
Miley aka shitfingers</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/479439</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/479439</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 10:49:40 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Guns will never be banned on Sun, 12 Apr 2026 10:49:39 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>/.ㅤ</strong> — <em>6 months ago(October 03, 2025 01:43 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">How big is your cock?<br />
My password is password.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/479438</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/479438</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 10:49:39 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Guns will never be banned on Sun, 12 Apr 2026 10:49:39 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Soul_Venom</strong> — <em>6 months ago(October 03, 2025 01:41 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">The 2nd is not outdated. Human nature hasn't chanced.<br />
Your post is the equivalent to those who make comparisons of guns to small penises. It is hollow mockery. One has nothing to do with the other and your lot will never embarrass us into willingly relinquishing our God given rights.<br />
Trump is still your President.  Charlie Kirk still Wins!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/479437</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/479437</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 10:49:39 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Guns will never be banned on Sun, 12 Apr 2026 10:49:39 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>$top</strong> — <em>6 months ago(October 03, 2025 12:09 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Outdated rules in a modern society made by a bunch of ****** men, but call it whatever you want if it makes you feel better.<br />
<a href="https://voca.ro/1bwJIF2bmFi0" rel="nofollow ugc">https://voca.ro/1bwJIF2bmFi0</a><br />
Miley aka shitfingers</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/479436</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/479436</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 10:49:39 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Guns will never be banned on Sun, 12 Apr 2026 10:49:38 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Soul_Venom</strong> — <em>6 months ago(October 03, 2025 12:03 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Indeed. I was actually surprised that the government forces scored that high but the AI was very conservative on just how much of the armed populace will fight and just how much of the military would refuse to violate the 2nd amendment.  I personally think that it will be at least twice what the AI predicts. That would make it closer to 80/20.<br />
Trump is still your President.  Charlie Kirk still Wins!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/479435</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/479435</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 10:49:38 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Guns will never be banned on Sun, 12 Apr 2026 10:49:38 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>/.ㅤ</strong> — <em>6 months ago(October 03, 2025 08:42 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">3 v 77 settled once and for all. Rocketman in shambles.<br />
My password is password.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/479434</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/479434</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 10:49:38 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Guns will never be banned on Sun, 12 Apr 2026 10:49:37 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Soul_Venom</strong> — <em>6 months ago(October 03, 2025 12:00 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">^^deliberately choosing ignorance.  A bold strategy<br />
Trump is still your President.  Charlie Kirk still Wins!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/479433</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/479433</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 10:49:37 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>