<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Failed 1990s Tech: Why These 5 Gadgets Didn&#x27;t Survive]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Gadgets</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>TMC-4</strong> — <em>9 years ago(May 14, 2016 11:20 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto"><a href="http://www.cheatsheet.com/gear-style/failed-1990s-tech-why-these-5-gadgets-didnt-survive.html/?ref=YF" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.cheatsheet.com/gear-style/failed-1990s-tech-why-these-5-gadgets-didnt-survive.html/?ref=YF</a><br />
The 1990s were an important period for the technology industry, as quite a few things we take for granted today had their origins then and are worth big money now. Microsofts Windows and the Start Menu redefined how we interacted with our PCs, while the World Wide Web revolutionized the way we accessed the internet. Despite all the good things that came out of the 90s, some technology innovations ended up falling flat.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/4691/failed-1990s-tech-why-these-5-gadgets-didn-t-survive</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 16:09:26 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/4691.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 04:38:26 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Failed 1990s Tech: Why These 5 Gadgets Didn&#x27;t Survive on Sat, 11 Apr 2026 04:38:26 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Speed_Daemon</strong> — <em>9 years ago(May 26, 2016 04:58 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">That's a mighty ironic title.  You see, the<br />
tech<br />
didn't fail at all, far from it!  It's only those particular<br />
products<br />
that didn't make it bigand even that isn't exactly "failure".  Let's look:<br />
1.<br />
Apple Newton</p>
<ul>
<li>This product was simply too costly and too proprietary to be competition to the<br />
Palm Pilot<br />
that it was a copy of.  While the<br />
PDA<br />
in general was only moderately successful, once the technology advanced to be able to merge a cellphone with a PDA, the<br />
smartphone<br />
was born.  And in case you didn't notice, they're a runaway success.</li>
</ul>
<ol start="2">
<li></li>
</ol>
<p dir="auto">Sony Minidisc</p>
<ul>
<li>I had one.<br />
The minidisc was an inexpensive alternative to the<br />
Digital Compact Cassette<br />
, a product that<br />
really<br />
bombed after the RIAA attacked relentlessly.  But the<br />
technology<br />
behind the Minidisc is still winning today.  Minidisc was among the first to use<br />
lossy compression<br />
, which is the same technology that<br />
MP3<br />
music uses.  Although not successful in volume, Sony's ATRAC is still considered one of the best lossy compression algorithms around.  And those tiny<br />
3" optical discs<br />
are still a handy alternative when a 5" disc is just too big to carry.  Maybe not a runaway success, but success nonetheless.</li>
</ul>
<ol start="3">
<li></li>
</ol>
<p dir="auto">Virtuality</p>
<ul>
<li>Do I really need to say that<br />
virtual reality<br />
is YUGE these days?  It was a product ahead of its time, but the<br />
tech<br />
is burgeoning today.</li>
</ul>
<ol start="4">
<li></li>
</ol>
<p dir="auto">Video CD</p>
<ul>
<li>First of all, I should point out that<br />
VCD<br />
was<br />
a runaway success in Asia, so this claim is completely false.  And the<br />
MPEG-1<br />
compression scheme led to<br />
MPEG-2<br />
(used in the<br />
DVD<br />
),<br />
MPEG-4<br />
,<br />
H.264<br />
(used in<br />
Blu-ray<br />
) and more advanced codecs.  Not a failure by any measure.</li>
</ul>
<ol start="5">
<li></li>
</ol>
<p dir="auto">WebTV</p>
<ul>
<li>Once again a product ahead of its time.  I had one of these too.  And just as VR is hot today, OTT (over the top) boxes are<br />
smoking!<br />
Services like<br />
Netflix<br />
,<br />
Hulu<br />
and yes,<br />
Amazon Prime<br />
video are revolutionizing how we watch "TV".  And<br />
boxes from Roku, Google and Amazon<br />
are the Next Big Thing today.  If you went to NAB this spring, you know what I'm talking about.<br />
In conclusion, Ed Oswald needs to get a clue.</li>
</ul>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/32444</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/32444</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 04:38:26 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>