<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[The least pretty&#x2F;talented of the Angels.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Film and Television Discussion</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>SimplemindedSociety</strong> — <em>12 years ago(September 02, 2013 03:16 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Her acting is not good in any project she's done. Scapegoating the writers is an excuse,and annoying. She's not an actress.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/54897/the-least-pretty-talented-of-the-angels</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 22:08:14 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/54897.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 08:24:30 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The least pretty&#x2F;talented of the Angels. on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 08:24:39 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Cognoscente</strong> — <em>3 months ago(January 02, 2026 08:07 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">She inspired a lot of devotion:<br />
<a href="https://shelleyhack.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://shelleyhack.blogspot.com/</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/583668</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/583668</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 08:24:39 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The least pretty&#x2F;talented of the Angels. on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 08:24:38 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/583667</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/583667</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 08:24:38 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The least pretty&#x2F;talented of the Angels. on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 08:24:38 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>mls4182</strong> — <em>9 years ago(November 03, 2016 01:31 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Maybe EARTHY is a better word.   They have said that about Elizabeth Taylor and they meant it as a compliment.  <img src="https://filmglance.com/discuss/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f642.png?v=8570fb93240" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--slightly_smiling_face" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=":)" alt="🙂" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/583666</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/583666</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 08:24:38 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The least pretty&#x2F;talented of the Angels. on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 08:24:37 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/583665</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/583665</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 08:24:37 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The least pretty&#x2F;talented of the Angels. on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 08:24:37 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>mls4182</strong> — <em>9 years ago(November 03, 2016 01:18 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I've decided to open my mind about Tanya and watch the shows again after reading your comments.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/583664</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/583664</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 08:24:37 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The least pretty&#x2F;talented of the Angels. on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 08:24:36 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/583663</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/583663</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 08:24:36 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The least pretty&#x2F;talented of the Angels. on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 08:24:36 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>mls4182</strong> — <em>9 years ago(November 03, 2016 01:07 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Well, to be fair.  Neither are we.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/583662</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/583662</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 08:24:36 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The least pretty&#x2F;talented of the Angels. on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 08:24:35 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>rascal67</strong> — <em>9 years ago(November 03, 2016 06:37 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I find Hack bland and a lacked a projected charisma that could have made her character more appealing. Even Smith, who's Kellie was more reserved and straight laced had her own uniqueness. Hack wasn't that endearing to me.<br />
Don't eat the whole ones! Those are for the guests.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/583661</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/583661</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 08:24:35 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The least pretty&#x2F;talented of the Angels. on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 08:24:35 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>mls4182</strong> — <em>9 years ago(November 03, 2016 06:49 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I will try looking at her that way.   As far as Shelley, I think people were just traumatized by her frizzy hair the first half of the season.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/583660</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/583660</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 08:24:35 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The least pretty&#x2F;talented of the Angels. on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 08:24:34 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>rascal67</strong> — <em>9 years ago(November 02, 2016 04:02 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Roberts had a sweet vulnerability about herself, she lacked pretense and was natural and charming. She was also the most attractive of ALL the angels. Hack was just that, a hack. She was lucky enough just to be cast.<br />
Don't eat the whole ones! Those are for the guests.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/583659</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/583659</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 08:24:34 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The least pretty&#x2F;talented of the Angels. on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 08:24:34 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/583658</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/583658</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 08:24:34 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The least pretty&#x2F;talented of the Angels. on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 08:24:33 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>mls4182</strong> — <em>9 years ago(November 03, 2016 06:48 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Well we all have our tastes and opinions.   That is what makes the world go around.   Tanya probably suffered because the producers mostly just wanted to get enough episodes for syndication and were going through the rounds.<br />
I watched the show for glamour mostly and I was relieved when they finally started defrizzing poor Shelley's hair.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/583657</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/583657</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 08:24:33 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The least pretty&#x2F;talented of the Angels. on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 08:24:33 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/583656</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/583656</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 08:24:33 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The least pretty&#x2F;talented of the Angels. on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 08:24:32 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/583655</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/583655</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 08:24:32 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The least pretty&#x2F;talented of the Angels. on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 08:24:32 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/583654</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/583654</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 08:24:32 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The least pretty&#x2F;talented of the Angels. on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 08:24:32 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>mls4182</strong> — <em>9 years ago(October 30, 2016 06:28 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Thumbs up!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/583653</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/583653</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 08:24:32 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The least pretty&#x2F;talented of the Angels. on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 08:24:31 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Diamond97</strong> — <em>9 years ago(October 29, 2016 09:11 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I thought Shelley Hack was great as an Angel.  She's underrated, in my opinion.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/583652</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/583652</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 08:24:31 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The least pretty&#x2F;talented of the Angels. on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 08:24:31 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>mls4182</strong> — <em>9 years ago(September 11, 2016 07:16 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">She got better and so did her grooming towards the end of the season.  She was much better than the cheap Tanya Roberts.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/583651</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/583651</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 08:24:31 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>