<![CDATA[Prescilla was smokin hot..]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Film and Television Discussion

addiemac2020 — 10 years ago(March 30, 2016 09:55 AM)

This woman was beautiful in her 20's & 30's however I think she was sensationally attractive in this movie (think she was about 45 odd)
Levi's really did have it all

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/56131/prescilla-was-smokin-hotRSS for NodeTue, 12 May 2026 16:06:14 GMTMon, 13 Apr 2026 09:52:08 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Prescilla was smokin hot.. on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 09:52:09 GMT]]>lukejbarnett — 5 months ago(October 17, 2025 01:42 PM)

Exactly I noticed she has alluring model calibre natural beauty in this film. It's her facial bone structure, her cheek bones, and her stunning blue eyes.
Though she doesn't look as beautiful as in the first film bc she looks a little older in this she still looks great in this and has dark brown hair instead of blonde hair in the first film.
But at might be even more beautiful in this than in the first film bc I wasn't as wowed by her beauty in the first film as I was by her beauty in this film.
lukejbarnett

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/594759https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/594759Mon, 13 Apr 2026 09:52:09 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Prescilla was smokin hot.. on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 09:52:09 GMT]]>shanayneigh — 9 years ago(September 03, 2016 07:38 AM)

Oh yes, she indeed was

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/594758https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/594758Mon, 13 Apr 2026 09:52:09 GMT