<![CDATA[jumped the shark]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Film and Television Discussion

lukejbarnett — 4 years ago(April 11, 2021 12:19 PM)

i think pretty much everyone agrees this movies is not good enough for a back to the future movie and that it is not that good of a movie.
sometimes a third movie in a series isn't a good idea and this is a shining example of that.
all the shine, the allure, and greatness and originality of the first 2 films were not in this movie.
even if this movie wasn't in this series it wouldn't be a really good movie.
lukejbarnett

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/57515/jumped-the-sharkRSS for NodeWed, 13 May 2026 13:35:37 GMTMon, 13 Apr 2026 11:26:34 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to jumped the shark on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 11:26:35 GMT]]>Chicxulub — 9 months ago(July 07, 2025 04:09 PM)

I thought the 2nd one wasn't good enough, so I never even watched this one.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/606871https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/606871Mon, 13 Apr 2026 11:26:35 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to jumped the shark on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 11:26:35 GMT]]>kuatorises — 9 months ago(July 07, 2025 03:48 PM)

It's ok. Not great, but the franchise definitely lost steam at this point.
The train is just atrocious. Mad Dog and Strickland are nowhere near as memorable as previous versions of the character.
I won't say I hate it or didn't laugh, but it's definitely the weak link.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/606870https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/606870Mon, 13 Apr 2026 11:26:35 GMT