<![CDATA[7.7 really?]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Film and Television Discussion

axlgage — 9 years ago(February 10, 2017 08:12 PM)

Come on.i would have at least given it 8.2 the acting,script,soundtrack all were great.i have seen "not that great" movies on imdb have much higher rating

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/57926/7-7-reallyRSS for NodeTue, 12 May 2026 20:55:13 GMTMon, 13 Apr 2026 11:51:19 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to 7.7 really? on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 11:51:21 GMT]]>Masher — 9 months ago(June 09, 2025 12:28 AM)

1978’s King Kong ain’t got nothing on this

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/610004https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/610004Mon, 13 Apr 2026 11:51:21 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 7.7 really? on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 11:51:20 GMT]]>Woodyanders — 9 months ago(June 09, 2025 12:17 AM)

Currently 7.8 on the IMDb, which is a really goddamn ****ing high rating for that website.
You've seen Guy Standeven in something because the man was in everything.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/610003https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/610003Mon, 13 Apr 2026 11:51:20 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 7.7 really? on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 11:51:20 GMT]]>bigbadwolf666 — 2 years ago(May 10, 2023 04:36 AM)

Bro are you on crack!
Im surprised it’s even a 6.
Without strife, your victory has no meaning.
Without strife, you do not advance.
Without strife, there is only stagnation.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/610002https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/610002Mon, 13 Apr 2026 11:51:20 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 7.7 really? on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 11:51:19 GMT]]>IMDb User

This message has been deleted.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/610001https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/610001Mon, 13 Apr 2026 11:51:19 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 7.7 really? on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 11:51:19 GMT]]>Movie&TVSummaries — 2 years ago(May 05, 2023 02:20 AM)

Totally concur but many are being snobs about this film nowadays.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/610000https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/610000Mon, 13 Apr 2026 11:51:19 GMT