<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Donald Sutherland is one of the narrators but only for a little bit. His voice has degraded so it is difficult to unders]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Film and Television Discussion</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>merry christmas</strong> — <em>4 years ago(December 17, 2021 05:37 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Donald Sutherland is one of the narrators but only for a little bit. His voice has degraded so it is difficult to understand him. He should have got Kevin Costner. Some of the sound mixing was bad. Parts were too quiet. Maybe that is a problem with my computer though. Music is constantly droning through every scene which distracts from or makes difficult to hear what is being said. A lot of the actual content of the movie can seem abstruse or the typical anomaly hunting of conspiracy theories but it all does leave the impression that the Warren Commission was a fraud.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/58286/donald-sutherland-is-one-of-the-narrators-but-only-for-a-little-bit-his-voice-has-degraded-so-it-is-difficult-to-unders</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 18:49:41 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/58286.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 12:15:57 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Donald Sutherland is one of the narrators but only for a little bit. His voice has degraded so it is difficult to unders on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 12:15:58 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>WarrenPeace</strong> — <em>11 months ago(May 08, 2025 02:29 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">My recent epiphany conspiracy theory on LHO is this….<br />
He was picked as the patsy because of where he worked so they, the ones behind killing Kennedy, could say the shots came from the depository.<br />
(I guess there were no other buildings along the route to claim shots came from them and cover for the real gunmen. This was probably the best spot for them which makes sense the CIA would be involved with the planning.)<br />
And then they made up all sorts of other things about him such as embracing Russia, being pro or anti Castro etc.<br />
I think he did meet his future wife in Russia?<br />
Other than that they must have made up all kinds of anti American background stuff because that just seems too incredible of a coincidence that a pro communist happens to work in the same building with that vantage point.<br />
"Please vote to preserve the unique character of Warren…" - Robert Duvall</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/613069</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/613069</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 12:15:58 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Donald Sutherland is one of the narrators but only for a little bit. His voice has degraded so it is difficult to unders on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 12:15:58 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>JohnnyBoy</strong> — <em>11 months ago(May 07, 2025 08:38 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">"My only complaint or what I had a hard time in following is where and when Oswald was at certain times in his life and what he was doing.<br />
He was a complex character either on his own or because of all the BS they could have made up about him."<br />
A mix of both. The bottom line is: the CIA and the FBI knew all about him beforehand and had trained him. That completes the link. Everybody else that followed like Jack Ruby made it stronger. In other words, it's impossible to overlook the "conspiracy" angle. More than likely, Oswald was created to be the fall guy, but how long back did the machination start is the question.<br />
For tons of movie reviews, 60+ genre lists, best of the year lists, and other content, check out:<br />
<a href="http://www.thecineviewer.com" rel="nofollow ugc">www.thecineviewer.com</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/613068</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/613068</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 12:15:58 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Donald Sutherland is one of the narrators but only for a little bit. His voice has degraded so it is difficult to unders on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 12:15:58 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>WarrenPeace</strong> — <em>1 year ago(December 03, 2024 08:03 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I watched it with subtitles, as I do for everything, and that helps since I am more of a visual than auditory person.<br />
Maybe try rewatching with those on?<br />
I just dunno how anyone can still think Lee Oswald did it after watching this which does an excellent job showing how there is no way that he did.<br />
it all does leave the impression that the Warren Commission was a fraud.<br />
This is true.<br />
And also in showing how evidence was manipulated in following it.<br />
My only complaint or what I had a hard time in following is where and when Oswald was at certain times in his life and what he was doing.<br />
He was a complex character either on his own or because of all the BS they could have made up about him.<br />
Other than that really good doc. that takes it away from being a conspiracy theory into being an actual conspiracy.<br />
"Please vote to preserve the unique character of Warren…" - Robert Duvall</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/613067</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/613067</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 12:15:58 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>