<![CDATA[…for allegations from 1999 to 2005. Guilty or not, charging someone so long after the fact for this type of crime is r]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Film and Television Discussion

Chicxulub — 12 months ago(April 04, 2025 02:41 PM)

…for allegations from 1999 to 2005. Guilty or not, charging someone so long after the fact for this type of crime is ridiculous.
Short of DNA or audio/video evidence, it's just he said, she said. If they had the former, they'd have come forward back then.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/58652/for-allegations-from-1999-to-2005-guilty-or-not-charging-someone-so-long-after-the-fact-for-this-type-of-crime-is-rRSS for NodeSat, 16 May 2026 20:12:52 GMTMon, 13 Apr 2026 12:40:33 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to …for allegations from 1999 to 2005. Guilty or not, charging someone so long after the fact for this type of crime is r on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 12:40:35 GMT]]>Tits Malone, PI — 12 months ago(April 04, 2025 02:46 PM)

It's politically motivated. He's been targeted by the elites.
Donna/LadyGigi Savige needs to sit her ass down!

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/616088https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/616088Mon, 13 Apr 2026 12:40:35 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to …for allegations from 1999 to 2005. Guilty or not, charging someone so long after the fact for this type of crime is r on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 12:40:35 GMT]]>bigbadwolf666 — 12 months ago(April 04, 2025 04:01 PM)

It should.
Because a Crime is a crime.
Without strife, your victory has no meaning.
Without strife, you do not advance.
Without strife, there is only stagnation.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/616087https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/616087Mon, 13 Apr 2026 12:40:35 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to …for allegations from 1999 to 2005. Guilty or not, charging someone so long after the fact for this type of crime is r on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 12:40:34 GMT]]>Chicxulub — 12 months ago(April 04, 2025 03:02 PM)

I meant to say it shouldn't be legally possible.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/616086https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/616086Mon, 13 Apr 2026 12:40:34 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to …for allegations from 1999 to 2005. Guilty or not, charging someone so long after the fact for this type of crime is r on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 12:40:34 GMT]]>bigbadwolf666 — 12 months ago(April 04, 2025 02:46 PM)

They know that,
That’s why their charging him.
Without strife, your victory has no meaning.
Without strife, you do not advance.
Without strife, there is only stagnation.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/616085https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/616085Mon, 13 Apr 2026 12:40:34 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to …for allegations from 1999 to 2005. Guilty or not, charging someone so long after the fact for this type of crime is r on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 12:40:33 GMT]]>HollyJollyHanukka — 12 months ago(April 04, 2025 02:44 PM)

Not necessarily.
If you can’t say something nice, say something clever but devastating.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/616084https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/616084Mon, 13 Apr 2026 12:40:33 GMT