<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Entertaining]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Film and Television Discussion</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>nrbarton</strong> — <em>18 years ago(July 17, 2007 06:46 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I don't get why people dislike this movie so much on here. I watch a lot of really low budget horrors and this was actually better than average believe it or not.<br />
Sure the CGI was absolutely terrible but it was amusing. The stories were ok, nothing amazing but I wasn't bored for a second. The third story was actually pretty good I thought.<br />
So at least this was entertaining and amusing which is more than I can say for a lot of the really low budget horrors. I was expecting it to be worse.<br />
Some more graphic gore would have been appreciated.<br />
Maybe I'm crazy or easily amused but I found this film rather charming. It's a good one to watch with a few friends and have a giggle over. I'm not saying it's a great film because it's not but it's fun and kept me interested throughout.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/60543/entertaining</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 22:30:52 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/60543.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 15:17:56 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Entertaining on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 15:17:57 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Woodyanders</strong> — <em>1 year ago(October 15, 2024 11:50 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">The first two stories were seriously lacking in any essential tension and creepy atmosphere. Only the third story managed to generate any real tension and creepy atmosphere.<br />
You've seen Guy Standeven in something because the man was in everything.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/634010</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/634010</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 15:17:57 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Entertaining on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 15:17:56 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>FridayOnElmStreet</strong> — <em>11 years ago(January 01, 2015 05:25 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I didnt care for it.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/634009</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/634009</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 15:17:56 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>