<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[&quot;Banned Movies That You Will Never See Again&quot;]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Internet Films/Videos</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>jriddle73</strong> — <em>2 years ago(April 05, 2023 05:44 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Ok, it's a pretty standard practice to slap some eye-catching title on one's content, something clever or funny or sensational that will make it stand out and thus draw attention. This Youtube video goes for the sensational. None of the movies this fellow describes in his video are either "banned" or gone forever. In fact, he includes some of the most beloved movies ever made, movies that are never likely to go away (even the ones we wish would just go away).<br />
The vid is, instead, a sort of variant on the old "they'd never make that one anymore" theme, the kind of conversations cinephiles have about flicks like BLAZING SADDLES (which is included in his list). But it's a rather dark and perhaps even disturbing variant, one in which the narrator is disposing of wide swathes of great movies of the past–most, the fairly recent past–because they aren't "racially sensitive" or get "gender-roles" "wrong" or include "stereotypes." It's offers what, these days, rightists would pejoratively describe as a "woke" analysis. But it also repeatedly expels movies (and says they deserve to be forgotten) based on some of the right's bugaboos–"insensitivity" to religion, too much sex and nudity, etc. Cumulatively, it's an analysis so insanely out of touch as to be unifying: those rightists and the most progressive of progressives can–and will–join together in making fun of it and wondering, in the course of watching it, WTF is wrong with some people.<br />
All of this, of course, assumes the vid is supposed to be taken seriously and isn't intended as satire. If that was the point, it would be pretty damn effective. He says, HEATHERS "normalized bullying" and that MR. MOM's title damns it because implies woman's place is in the home, "which is not connected to today's views." CROCODILE DUNDEE is no good because (in part) of its "explicit language and crude comedy."<br />
Ex-Laxx, not a reevaluation of cinema, is what is called for here.<br />
"The Dig"<br />
<a href="http://cinemarchaeologist.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://cinemarchaeologist.blogspot.com/</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/60774/banned-movies-that-you-will-never-see-again</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 06:02:52 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/60774.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 15:33:00 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to &quot;Banned Movies That You Will Never See Again&quot; on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 15:33:03 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Movie&amp;TVSummaries</strong> — <em>2 years ago(May 05, 2023 12:58 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">More clickbait videos.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/635693</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/635693</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 15:33:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to &quot;Banned Movies That You Will Never See Again&quot; on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 15:33:03 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>frtt wins2</strong> — <em>2 years ago(April 05, 2023 06:20 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">it has to be a joke cuz all movie no matter how offensive some ppl think they r erases time and context and a lot of other things we should no have to forget. it's like rewriting history. the more i see of this the more it reminds me of the book 1984. imo if u don't like it don't see or read it.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/635692</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/635692</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 15:33:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to &quot;Banned Movies That You Will Never See Again&quot; on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 15:33:02 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>jriddle73</strong> — <em>2 years ago(April 07, 2023 12:26 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Utterly. But the question is, is it intentionally so? Is it satire?<br />
"The Dig"<br />
<a href="http://cinemarchaeologist.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://cinemarchaeologist.blogspot.com/</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/635691</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/635691</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 15:33:02 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to &quot;Banned Movies That You Will Never See Again&quot; on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 15:33:02 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Jan_El_Senor</strong> — <em>2 years ago(April 05, 2023 06:11 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">This video is stupid<br />
Grade "A" Fully Loaded<br />
"Sexy as Hell"</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/635690</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/635690</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 15:33:02 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to &quot;Banned Movies That You Will Never See Again&quot; on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 15:33:01 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>/.​</strong> — <em>2 years ago(April 05, 2023 06:11 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Weird to pick Heathers when they made a show out of it in 2018.<br />
<a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heathers_(TV_series)" rel="nofollow ugc">https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heathers_(TV_series)</a><br />
My password is password</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/635689</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/635689</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 15:33:01 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>