Nothing. They're beautiful.

So…now that I've come out, are you happy for me?

What a long-winded way of announcing your departure from the closet. Let's be honest, though; you've never made a woman that wet. It's okay to admit that you're embarrassed by and bitter about it.
The train is coming with shiny cars, comfy seats, and wheels of stars. Hush, little ones, have no fear; the man in the moon is the engineer.

𝐸𝓇𝒾𝒸𝒶𝑅𝑒𝓃𝑒—𝒫𝓇𝒾𝒸𝑒

How do you know what a girl would infer or wouldn’t and why are you so cowardly as to hide behind a sock to say that?
Do you think the rest of us are stupid?
"You had me at Elk Tartare"
-Erin Wotherspoon

^ Proof you’re a male catfish. A girl wouldn’t infer that.

That's why having sex in the snow is a good idea. The exchange of body heat is enough to keep you warm but it's cold enough to neutralize the effects of perspiration. Everything stays pure and minty.

Not to mention it’s not just pussy juice involved. Sweat from both parties as well as precum from the guy would account for that nasty mess.

This message has been deleted.

This message has been deleted.

Actually porn is a sort of fantasy utopia where that doesn't happen. It presents this illusion that women are these perfect beings with flat tummies and no visible secretions. In many cases different than real sex.

He hasn't experienced anything in his post. He's basing it on porn he watches.

𝐸𝓇𝒾𝒸𝒶𝑅𝑒𝓃𝑒—𝒫𝓇𝒾𝒸𝑒

Classic humblebrag thread, PE.
"You had me at Elk Tartare"
-Erin Wotherspoon

You need a sex robot.

Meh, I guess. I guess what a mean by close-up is an image of the canal itself. Usually if the woman's aroused, there's context, without being too specific, fingers, labia, etc. Anuses work similarly. A close-up of an anus obviously isn't a turn on. But if it shows in a picture of a whole ass of a girl bending over, then that's fine. I don't know if gay guys get turned on by anus pictures or not.

Straight men are hardly the only demographic to appreciate butts and boobs. Straight women and gay men seem to appreciate them, too.
And fine, a sterile, clinical image of a pussy may not be too alluring, but the image of an "aroused" (I feel like there's no way to discuss this without sounding clinical or 13 years-old, oddly) swollen vulva/pussy (why not both?) is something of beauty, if perhaps only for the psychosexual association.
Love 'em. Any straight guy who doesn't probably isn't straight (and that's alright!).

"Vaginas" i.e. procreative genitalia have never been the primary lure for straight male female attraction. It's the boobs, butts, and curves men are enticed by. Not the vagina in and of itself.
Hence why sex in advertising may show women in bikinis to show their shape/curves, but not focus on close-ups of their cameltoe. The vagina alone isn't what attracts men, it's to whom it is attached, - it's only attractive as a sum of its parts.
Generally, when women send nudes, the focus is their butts and boobs in alluring poses, not close-ups of their vaginas.
A picture of a close-up of a vagina isn't naturally a turn on. It'd just look like a pic from a gynecology exam. It need context. The whole body (or some of it, thighs etc.) would have to be showing with it. But a pair of boobs and a butt is very different.

I'm gagging just thinking about it: when they're so wet that you can hear the sound of the liquid churning during intercourse, and it drips all over themselves, their vag juice all over the outside of the labia, onto their thighs, and all that.
I love that.
I've never understood "straight" guys who are disgusted by vaginas. It would be like a gay guy being all, "penises are alright, as long as they're not too penis-like"… which no gay guy has ever said.

Itty is that you?

This message has been deleted.

This message has been deleted.

This message has been deleted.

This message has been deleted.

This message has been deleted.

This message has been deleted.