<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Kang was likely going to be dropped by Marvel even without Majors&#x27; legal issues]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Marvel/DC</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>Nathanred</strong> — <em>1 year ago(October 12, 2024 10:44 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">According to an industry insider there just wasn't enough interest in the character.<br />
<a href="https://fictionhorizon.com/the-reasons-behind-marvels-decision-to-drop-kang-instead-of-recasting/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://fictionhorizon.com/the-reasons-behind-marvels-decision-to-drop-kang-instead-of-recasting/</a><br />
Majors’ legal troubles weren’t the sole reason for the studio’s decision to abandon the character. Public perception also played a significant role, as Kang was seen as an uninteresting and poorly executed villain.<br />
Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania underperformed at the box office and received largely negative reviews. Many fans were disappointed that Kang was defeated solely by Ant-Man in the film.<br />
Confidence in Kang’s ability to generate the same excitement as Thanos was virtually nonexistent. Even before Majors’ verdict, the studio was reportedly reconsidering the introduction of a different villain to take Kang’s place. This was recently confirmed by Daniel Richtman, a well-known industry insider.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/64975/kang-was-likely-going-to-be-dropped-by-marvel-even-without-majors-legal-issues</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 17:35:10 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/64975.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 21:16:09 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Kang was likely going to be dropped by Marvel even without Majors&#x27; legal issues on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 21:16:16 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>DojoDanny</strong> — <em>1 year ago(October 13, 2024 01:04 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Embarrassing meltdown over lack of reading comprehension.<br />
Do I need to put you on my blocklist with the other useless *******?<br />
Flawless victory. Another one for the good guys.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/673564</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/673564</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 21:16:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Kang was likely going to be dropped by Marvel even without Majors&#x27; legal issues on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 21:16:15 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>The&lt;&gt;Mechanic</strong> — <em>1 year ago(October 13, 2024 01:15 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Sophie, pls.<br />
Ho Ho Ho</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/673563</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/673563</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 21:16:15 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Kang was likely going to be dropped by Marvel even without Majors&#x27; legal issues on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 21:16:15 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>/.ㅤ</strong> — <em>1 year ago(October 13, 2024 01:12 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Fugazi pls<br />
My password is password.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/673562</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/673562</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 21:16:15 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Kang was likely going to be dropped by Marvel even without Majors&#x27; legal issues on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 21:16:14 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/673561</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/673561</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 21:16:14 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Kang was likely going to be dropped by Marvel even without Majors&#x27; legal issues on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 21:16:14 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>/.ㅤ</strong> — <em>1 year ago(October 13, 2024 01:02 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">He should grow up and post pix of the castle he made out of potatoes and beans bc a girl on the internet did it.<br />
My password is password.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/673560</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/673560</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 21:16:14 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Kang was likely going to be dropped by Marvel even without Majors&#x27; legal issues on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 21:16:13 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/673559</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/673559</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 21:16:13 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Kang was likely going to be dropped by Marvel even without Majors&#x27; legal issues on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 21:16:13 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>DojoDanny</strong> — <em>1 year ago(October 13, 2024 12:52 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Embarrassing response.<br />
Flawless victory. Another one for the good guys.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/673558</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/673558</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 21:16:13 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Kang was likely going to be dropped by Marvel even without Majors&#x27; legal issues on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 21:16:12 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/673557</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/673557</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 21:16:12 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Kang was likely going to be dropped by Marvel even without Majors&#x27; legal issues on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 21:16:12 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>DojoDanny</strong> — <em>1 year ago(October 13, 2024 12:07 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Reading comprehension.<br />
Flawless victory. Another one for the good guys.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/673556</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/673556</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 21:16:12 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Kang was likely going to be dropped by Marvel even without Majors&#x27; legal issues on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 21:16:11 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/673555</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/673555</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 21:16:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Kang was likely going to be dropped by Marvel even without Majors&#x27; legal issues on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 21:16:11 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>DojoDanny</strong> — <em>1 year ago(October 13, 2024 12:01 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Why wouldn't Antman beat his ass though? Traditionally, kang is the Avengers whipping boy. He literally never wins.<br />
Flawless victory. Another one for the good guys.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/673554</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/673554</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 21:16:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Kang was likely going to be dropped by Marvel even without Majors&#x27; legal issues on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 21:16:10 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>/.ㅤ</strong> — <em>1 year ago(October 12, 2024 11:47 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Not having Ant-Man beat his ass in his first major appearance probably would have helped.<br />
My password is password.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/673553</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/673553</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 21:16:10 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Kang was likely going to be dropped by Marvel even without Majors&#x27; legal issues on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 21:16:10 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>DojoDanny</strong> — <em>1 year ago(October 12, 2024 11:13 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">tbf, Kang in the comics is also extremely boring, despite being considered by many as the Avengers greatest foe.<br />
I honestly don't know what they could do to make Kang interesting. Neither do they, apparently.<br />
Flawless victory. Another one for the good guys.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/673552</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/673552</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 21:16:10 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>