Since when did it beat Civil War? Where are u getting that info?

1. BVS 2. TWS 3. Avengers

Fact is it didn't . After 16 weeks of sales data BVS sold 2,063,408 Blu-rays for a total of $48,929,136 . After 8 weeks of sales data Civil War has sold 2,480,426 Blu-rays (almost half a million more in half the time)for a total of $49,647,847.
As for DVD sales BVS 1,025,910 units for $17,538,712 .14 weeks of data .
Civil War 943,371 units for $16,185,005 .8 weeks of data .
Combined totals BVS 3,089,318 units for $66,467,848 .
CW 3,423,797 units for $65,832,852 .
So Civil war has sold 400,000 more units in half the time .
This data also shows the average price of BVS was more than Civil War .
For a direct comparison BVS sold 2,771,165 Dvds and Blurays after 8 weeks to
Civil Wars 3,423,797 units .
All data from The Numbers website .

A film that's so bad it's good is more notable then a solidly good film.

List the 4 versions.

This message has been deleted.

I have BvS because I got the digital versions for a whopping 5 bucks (for both!). No physical copy.
Civil War I paid full price for the digital copy and got the blu-ray as a Christmas gift.

Well you're only one person, so it's not a good explanation.
Also if you decided to pay for the movie instead of waiting for it to be on TV that means you liked it enough.

I know the only reason that I have BvS on home video somewhere is that I wanted to see the full movie and while I think that Civil War is a far superior movie I don't own that on home video because I have no reason to I saw it in the cinema. So perhaps the answer is that in order to see the full version of BvS you had to buy the movie on home video while you could actually watch the full version of Civil War at the cinema. It is a clever tactic for getting more sales by WB with this double dipping by cutting large chunks out of the film in its cinema release but I have to say if they do it with JL I will skip watching it in the cinema and instead wait for the home video version to be released.
To make a great film you need three things - the script, the script and the script -Alfred Hitchcock

Not that you're looking for an answer, but here's a possible one. Civil War was put out by disney. Disney is notorious for rarely if ever lowering prices. BvS has been on the under 10 sale point multiple times since it's release (the blu-ray version). so more consumers are willing to buy it because it's less expensive.
This is an absolute reason in some previous cases. Most obvious: Man of Steel outselling Iron Man 3 with a price point about $10 lower on average. (My assumption is that Disney has been reluctant to put discs at bargain price because they want to make a killing on the large box sets later on.)
I don't think it's what's at play in his numbers, though. The data only runs up to early November for CA:CW and only up to mid-October for BvS, so the massive discounting hadn't even happened yet.
It's impossible to tell how big the impact of releasing two different versions of the film, with the "ultimate" version only available in premium formats, would be. It means die-hard fans would buy more than one copy, though. Some other customers would choose to purchase the premium-priced option, where they otherwise would have chosen to purchase the cheaper disc. (Or just wait to see it for free on cable - I've never seen the ultimate cut because I refuse to buy it.)
Otherwise, home video sales data is really hard to assess under even the best circumstances. There's so many moving parts, and they often don't follow obvious, rational patterns.

This message has been deleted.

This message has been deleted.

This message has been deleted.

Your personal attacks reek of butt-soreness and desperation.
Leave your emotions aside and post facts if you want to be taken seriously. Also no, going to the store won't prove anything, we're talking about thousands of retailers here.
You are not that smart, are you?

This message has been deleted.

I commented on that back when I switched to Blu-Ray, pointed out that on week 2, BvS dropped to 14.99 (No doubt to keep sales up and stay on the charts) and all the Marvel Films were the only ones I was having to pay full price on, everything else was getting collected at some great deals.
I think the ONLY MCU movie I got cheaper than release price was Incredible Hulk.

Thanks to Batmeh v Supermeh Yawn of Justice, the "S" now stands for Sidekick

Never said it was "the" reason. I put it out there as "a"
possible
reason.
You really cannot read well, can you?

People talk with their wallets.
Yes, that record setting week 2 drop off BvS suffered proves that easily enough.

Thanks to Batmeh v Supermeh Yawn of Justice, the "S" now stands for Sidekick

People talk with their wallets. Rt is irrelevant.
Copycat Trolls to Ignore
http://www.imdb.com/board/bd0000007/thread/253857259

Well considering YOUR argument is "People liked it more" which is 100% disproven just taking a trip to Rotten Tomatoes and looking at the audience score, (Don't look at the critics score, that'd just make you cry)
he proved his case a lot better than you did considering your argument was incorrect out of the gate.

Thanks to Batmeh v Supermeh Yawn of Justice, the "S" now stands for Sidekick

Then you can you prove price is the reason BvS outsold Civil War?
Also, depending on the product a higher Price can translate into even more money.

I never said "alone". Just like I said you were "smart".

You're assuming the consumer picks a movie based on it's price alone. That's a mistake. It is a factor but that's it. When a product is better consumers often pay more for it. When it comes to movies, music, etc. consumers often already know the product they're buying.
So assuming consumers would pick BvS over Civil War based on it's price alone is a flawed argument.
Also retailers have different prices. Walmart has BvS as high as $32.

Higher price can translate into more money.

And again oldboymclane owned poor bastard.
FROM:"Save me Batman, please, save me" WB and MOS TO:"Save me Product Placement, save me" WB and BvS