<![CDATA[How come no sequek]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Marvel/DC

chrismatt83 — 9 years ago(April 28, 2016 09:27 AM)

Did the movie not do good..?

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/66237/how-come-no-sequekRSS for NodeTue, 12 May 2026 19:28:21 GMTMon, 13 Apr 2026 23:00:35 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to How come no sequek on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 23:00:36 GMT]]>spookyrat1 — 9 years ago(January 27, 2017 07:49 PM)

It would have been lucky to get back its costs, so yeah, no sequel.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/685074https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/685074Mon, 13 Apr 2026 23:00:36 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to How come no sequek on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 23:00:36 GMT]]>externaltestaccount — 9 years ago(January 13, 2017 11:20 PM)

because when the studio execs gave it the nod, the producer thought it was the axe nod, not the sequel nod that the studio actually meant, so no sequel.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/685073https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/685073Mon, 13 Apr 2026 23:00:36 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to How come no sequek on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 23:00:35 GMT]]>ShallowAl69 — 9 years ago(May 06, 2016 09:37 AM)

Ah! Alas it only performed averagely at the box office and even less well critically.
But I thought the film was good and I liked it.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/685072https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/685072Mon, 13 Apr 2026 23:00:35 GMT