<![CDATA[But…Elle Fanning is bae]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Marvel/DC

raincrz_15 — 9 years ago(January 11, 2017 03:03 PM)

I actually don't mind reading about Elle Fanning. She's a pretty good actress tbh.
Remember when Dakota used to be the beep Ha. She grew up and they found out she wasn't so adorable anymore. But Elle Fanning is a good actress and rather easy on the eyes.
I kno this has nothing to do with JL. But let's be honest, everything that could be discussed has been discussed. Good on that guy trying to spice up this board. I'm a massive DC fan but I've lost a lot of interest with these movies after the beep we got with BvS and SSGod bless Elle Fanning!

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/66687/but-elle-fanning-is-baeRSS for NodeThu, 14 May 2026 18:49:42 GMTMon, 13 Apr 2026 23:40:20 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to But…Elle Fanning is bae on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 23:40:28 GMT]]>crististasi — 9 years ago(January 12, 2017 01:18 AM)

Elle Fanning is an amazing actress.She is beautiful and talented.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/689453https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/689453Mon, 13 Apr 2026 23:40:28 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to But…Elle Fanning is bae on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 23:40:27 GMT]]>crististasi — 9 years ago(January 11, 2017 10:46 PM)

Thank you for your support.Elle Fanning is an amazing actress.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/689452https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/689452Mon, 13 Apr 2026 23:40:27 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to But…Elle Fanning is bae on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 23:40:27 GMT]]>skribb_Mk2 — 9 years ago(January 11, 2017 05:53 PM)

Yeah Dakota is like miles uglier than Elle
http://www.wmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Dakota-Fanning1-760x760.jpg
PS. Not

.and then the bong hits him on the head and he falls RIGHT over the realitY

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/689451https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/689451Mon, 13 Apr 2026 23:40:27 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to But…Elle Fanning is bae on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 23:40:26 GMT]]>raincrz_15 — 9 years ago(January 11, 2017 04:04 PM)

Dakota was better tbh but not as pretty. Hence why she disappeared.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/689450https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/689450Mon, 13 Apr 2026 23:40:26 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to But…Elle Fanning is bae on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 23:40:26 GMT]]>brownstones — 9 years ago(January 11, 2017 04:02 PM)

I don't think she's a bad actress, but a bit dry.
=w=

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/689449https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/689449Mon, 13 Apr 2026 23:40:26 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to But…Elle Fanning is bae on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 23:40:25 GMT]]>raincrz_15 — 9 years ago(January 11, 2017 03:53 PM)

She wasn't so bad in that 20th century women movie. I can see the appeal.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/689448https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/689448Mon, 13 Apr 2026 23:40:25 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to But…Elle Fanning is bae on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 23:40:25 GMT]]>brownstones — 9 years ago(January 11, 2017 03:45 PM)

I don't think she's been pushed enough as an actress, not in any controversial manner, but her best performance was in Super8 and has been allowed to coast since then.
=w=

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/689447https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/689447Mon, 13 Apr 2026 23:40:25 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to But…Elle Fanning is bae on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 23:40:24 GMT]]>brownstones — 9 years ago(January 11, 2017 04:01 PM)

279 more times.
=w=

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/689446https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/689446Mon, 13 Apr 2026 23:40:24 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to But…Elle Fanning is bae on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 23:40:24 GMT]]>raincrz_15 — 9 years ago(January 11, 2017 03:54 PM)

The same relevant thread about the same mindeless bs can be spam as well to many people. I mean how many times do I need to hear Zack Snyder is a hack? Honestly.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/689445https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/689445Mon, 13 Apr 2026 23:40:24 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to But…Elle Fanning is bae on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 23:40:23 GMT]]>Skaathar — 9 years ago(January 11, 2017 03:44 PM)

At least they're relevant threads. The Elle Fanning threads are just spam.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/689444https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/689444Mon, 13 Apr 2026 23:40:23 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to But…Elle Fanning is bae on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 23:40:22 GMT]]>raincrz_15 — 9 years ago(January 11, 2017 03:45 PM)

Not for meor a lot of people who don't check this board every single day. I just came back after a three month leave. This board had become so toxic. It needed some comic relief.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/689443https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/689443Mon, 13 Apr 2026 23:40:22 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to But…Elle Fanning is bae on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 23:40:22 GMT]]>no_just_no — 9 years ago(January 11, 2017 03:41 PM)

And Elle Fanning posts aren't old threads as well?

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/689442https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/689442Mon, 13 Apr 2026 23:40:22 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to But…Elle Fanning is bae on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 23:40:21 GMT]]>raincrz_15 — 9 years ago(January 11, 2017 03:36 PM)

But another post about how this movie is going to be beep does? Or about how amazing it will be? Read posts like that everyday. Posts about how bad Lex Luther was or how bad the Joker was. Those are old threads.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/689441https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/689441Mon, 13 Apr 2026 23:40:21 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to But…Elle Fanning is bae on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 23:40:21 GMT]]>no_just_no — 9 years ago(January 11, 2017 03:06 PM)

Another post about Elle Fanning doesn't exactly spice up the board.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/689440https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/689440Mon, 13 Apr 2026 23:40:21 GMT