<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Printed 1s and 0s are the slowest way to transfer information]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Marvel/DC</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>dogbert_2001</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 03, 2017 07:54 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Using hexadecimal would have been 4x faster. TV viewers would still understand what was going on.<br />
The fastest, assuming it has to be visual and static, would be to use colored pixels.<br />
The color depth of each pixel and the resolution would have to match the android.<br />
For example, going from binary (1bit) to 24bit color would be 24x faster.<br />
Going from 3000 digits on a page to 1920x1080 (2073600) pixels would be 691x faster.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/66893/printed-1s-and-0s-are-the-slowest-way-to-transfer-information</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 14:55:30 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/66893.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 23:58:22 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Printed 1s and 0s are the slowest way to transfer information on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 23:58:23 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>caseyrook</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 04, 2017 12:59 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">All I can say is that Radcliffe must have only programmed her with 1's and 0's when be first made her.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/691436</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/691436</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 23:58:23 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>