<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Could have been great if they have made a proper third act action sequence. Tone wise it was serious, way better than pr]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Marvel/DC</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>ChrisTreborn</strong> — <em>9 years ago(November 12, 2016 05:24 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Could have been great if they have made a proper third act action sequence. Tone wise it was serious, way better than previous F4 'sitcom' movies</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/66990/could-have-been-great-if-they-have-made-a-proper-third-act-action-sequence-tone-wise-it-was-serious-way-better-than-pr</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 16:16:29 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/66990.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 00:09:05 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Could have been great if they have made a proper third act action sequence. Tone wise it was serious, way better than pr on Tue, 14 Apr 2026 00:09:07 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>vincent_schawl</strong> — <em>9 years ago(December 30, 2016 07:59 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">No, nothing about this was even worthy of being called a moviethe "story" here may have worked as a Saturday morning cartoon but probably not.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/692515</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/692515</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 00:09:07 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Could have been great if they have made a proper third act action sequence. Tone wise it was serious, way better than pr on Tue, 14 Apr 2026 00:09:06 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>justanicknamed</strong> — <em>9 years ago(November 16, 2016 07:05 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I just checked on here and I can't find a listing for the movie "Good Movie."<br />
And why would you post about that movie on this sh!tty movie's board?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/692514</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/692514</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 00:09:06 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Could have been great if they have made a proper third act action sequence. Tone wise it was serious, way better than pr on Tue, 14 Apr 2026 00:09:06 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>ChrisTreborn</strong> — <em>9 years ago(November 14, 2016 11:47 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">NO its a good movie.<br />
If we stay the course, we are dead! WE ARE ALL DEAD!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/692513</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/692513</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 00:09:06 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Could have been great if they have made a proper third act action sequence. Tone wise it was serious, way better than pr on Tue, 14 Apr 2026 00:09:05 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Gojiman</strong> — <em>9 years ago(November 12, 2016 06:50 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Oh, God, shut<br />
up<br />
, shill account.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/692512</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/692512</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 00:09:05 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>