<![CDATA[Great director choice]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Marvel/DC

dk17111 — 9 years ago(December 09, 2016 12:53 PM)

Just great

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/67463/great-director-choiceRSS for NodeTue, 12 May 2026 18:48:54 GMTTue, 14 Apr 2026 00:53:34 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Great director choice on Tue, 14 Apr 2026 00:53:35 GMT]]>hafabee — 9 years ago(December 09, 2016 03:23 PM)

Ah I see, that makes a lot more sense then.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/697361https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/697361Tue, 14 Apr 2026 00:53:35 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Great director choice on Tue, 14 Apr 2026 00:53:35 GMT]]>shoutnation — 9 years ago(December 09, 2016 01:34 PM)

I was being sarcastic. Very sarcastic.
2021. ANOTHER emminent reboot

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/697360https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/697360Tue, 14 Apr 2026 00:53:35 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Great director choice on Tue, 14 Apr 2026 00:53:34 GMT]]>hafabee — 9 years ago(December 09, 2016 01:21 PM)

Why do you think that?
I have never heard of this guy, and he hasn't done much. I enjoy The Onion news spoofs as much as the next fellow but I can't say I have ever seen any notable directing in them.
He looks like another one of these unknown directors that corporations love because they have no vision of their own (or are not allowed to pursue their own creative outlook) and can be pushed around by the studio executives to make as banal and neutral a movie as possible. Gotta keep these movies safe and sterile and nutless and not take any chances at all, this is business, not art entertainment!

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/697359https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/697359Tue, 14 Apr 2026 00:53:34 GMT