<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Anyone else feel this way?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Marvel/DC</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>Drive-in567</strong> — <em>9 years ago(December 04, 2016 02:18 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">First let me say I liked the movie. Great special effects. But IMO they could have knocked about 30 minutes off the movie. Anyone agree?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/67648/anyone-else-feel-this-way</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 17:00:16 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/67648.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 01:06:54 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Anyone else feel this way? on Tue, 14 Apr 2026 01:06:55 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>MydnightRose</strong> — <em>9 years ago(December 07, 2016 08:31 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">From what I've heard moat people think the UC is the better version and that adds 30 mins.</p>
<ol>
<li>BVS 2. TWS 3. Avengers</li>
</ol>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/698767</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/698767</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 01:06:55 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Anyone else feel this way? on Tue, 14 Apr 2026 01:06:54 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>fiero-49251</strong> — <em>9 years ago(December 05, 2016 08:55 PM)</em></p>
<ul>
<li></li>
</ul>
<h2><a href="http://http" rel="nofollow ugc">http://http</a>://people.com/celebrity/matt-damon-defends-ben-affleck-as-batman-but-wont-be-robin/</h2>
<p dir="auto">Matt Damon Defends Ben Affleck as Batman  But Won't Be Robin</p>
<ul>
<li>
<ul>
<li></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p dir="auto">Updated September 23, 2016 at 9:52pm EST</p>
<ul>
<li>
<ul>
<li></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p dir="auto">At least someone has Ben Afflecks back.<br />
Fanboys and girls melted down over the news that Affleck was set to play Batman in the next movie installment, but his pal Matt Damon thinks the 41-year-old will be great.<br />
It will be terrific, Damon tells the Times of India. I know there are a lot of people grousing on the Internet. I just think its kind of funny. You know hes not playing King Lear  its Batman! Certainly within his skill set.<br />
Damon, who won a Best Screenplay Oscar for Good Will Hunting with Affleck in 1997, adds, If anybody saw Argo or The Town and all the work hes been doing lately, its way more nuanced and interesting than Batman.<br />
There was speculation that once Affleck was cast, Damon, 42, would play his sidekick, Robin. But the actor laughs it off.<br />
RELATED: Ben Affleck as Batman? PEOPLEs Critic Swoops In on Backlash<br />
Im a little older than Ben, the father of four says. I never saw Robin as older than Batman.<br />
Though he did get the visual when somebody sent Damon picture of his face Photoshopped on Robins body and Afflecks on Batmans. It was really funny, he says. But its safe to say I wont be Robin.</p>
<ul>
<li>
<ul>
<li></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p dir="auto"><a href="http://scifiblogs3.blogspot.com/2012/12/batman-forever.html" rel="nofollow ugc">http://scifiblogs3.blogspot.com/2012/12/batman-forever.html</a></p>
<ul>
<li>
<ul>
<li></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li></li>
</ul>
<p dir="auto"><a href="http://www.childrenofrassilon.com/batman-forever.html" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.childrenofrassilon.com/batman-forever.html</a></p>
<ul>
<li>Batman Homage</li>
</ul>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/698766</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/698766</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 01:06:54 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>