<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Apparently the new way to judge RT scores]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Marvel/DC</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>CichlidAsh</strong> — <em>9 years ago(October 24, 2016 01:08 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Is by the average critic rating no one ever mentioned this before but according to the resident DC Zealots here this is the way to do it since Dr Strange opened with a 100% critical approval, isn't it a shame then that BvS has a totally pathetic rating of 4.9 a whole a full 2.1 points below Dr Strange face it no matter how you try and spin it a D list Marvel character has destroyed BvS for critical rating LMFAO. SO keep on crying DC zealots in fact cry me a river.<br />
To make a great film you need three things - the script, the script and the script -Alfred Hitchcock</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/69078/apparently-the-new-way-to-judge-rt-scores</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 09:04:49 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/69078.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 03:14:48 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Apparently the new way to judge RT scores on Tue, 14 Apr 2026 03:14:53 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>OdumC</strong> — <em>9 years ago(October 24, 2016 10:10 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Is by the average critic rating no one ever mentioned this before but according to the resident DC Zealots here this is the way to do it since Dr Strange opened with a 100% critical approval<br />
Well that's idiotic even for them</p>
<pre><code>Thanks to Batmeh v Supermeh Yawn of Justice, the "S" now stands for Sidekick</code></pre>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/712200</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/712200</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 03:14:53 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Apparently the new way to judge RT scores on Tue, 14 Apr 2026 03:14:53 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/712199</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/712199</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 03:14:53 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Apparently the new way to judge RT scores on Tue, 14 Apr 2026 03:14:52 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/712198</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/712198</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 03:14:52 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Apparently the new way to judge RT scores on Tue, 14 Apr 2026 03:14:52 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Sturm_Liouville</strong> — <em>9 years ago(October 24, 2016 09:57 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">lol you are pathetic.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/712197</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/712197</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 03:14:52 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Apparently the new way to judge RT scores on Tue, 14 Apr 2026 03:14:51 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Flamboyant_Little_Devil</strong> — <em>9 years ago(October 24, 2016 02:24 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">don't you just love their whining? It's like music<br />
You're more advanced than a cockroach, ever tried explaining yourself to one of them?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/712196</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/712196</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 03:14:51 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Apparently the new way to judge RT scores on Tue, 14 Apr 2026 03:14:50 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Kmadden2004</strong> — <em>9 years ago(October 24, 2016 11:38 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Yeah, but at least they've moved on from holding up the percentage at the top of the page as some kind of qualitative score.<br />
If you feel like Picard screaming how many lights there are, it's time to walk away from the thread.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/712195</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/712195</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 03:14:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Apparently the new way to judge RT scores on Tue, 14 Apr 2026 03:14:50 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>CichlidAsh</strong> — <em>9 years ago(October 24, 2016 08:07 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">The thing is if you actually look into the reviews by the critics most are actually from a 5 point system instead of a 10 so when it is converted to a 10 point system you lose ratings.<br />
To make a great film you need three things - the script, the script and the script -Alfred Hitchcock</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/712194</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/712194</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 03:14:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Apparently the new way to judge RT scores on Tue, 14 Apr 2026 03:14:49 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Kmadden2004</strong> — <em>9 years ago(October 24, 2016 01:55 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">In all fairness, at least it shows they're beginning to grasp how RT works at least on some level.<br />
If you feel like Picard screaming how many lights there are, it's time to walk away from the thread.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/712193</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/712193</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 03:14:49 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Apparently the new way to judge RT scores on Tue, 14 Apr 2026 03:14:49 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>WeirdRaptor</strong> — <em>9 years ago(October 24, 2016 10:11 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Correction. 6.9 and rising.<br />
"All you have to decide is what to do with the time that is given to you." -Gandalf</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/712192</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/712192</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 03:14:49 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Apparently the new way to judge RT scores on Tue, 14 Apr 2026 03:14:48 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>shellywebstere</strong> — <em>9 years ago(October 24, 2016 01:30 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">It depends were you are from, lots of countries use that system and yes 4,9 is crap but 6.9 isn't great. That rating proves that Disney isn't paying the critics.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/712191</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/712191</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 03:14:48 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>