<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Looks like an interesting setyup]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Marvel/DC</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>sirandar</strong> — <em>9 years ago(October 21, 2016 10:46 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I really like what James Mangold did with the Wolverine.<br />
The problem is The Wolverine seemed to have 2 influences.  One that made it a smart interesting experience with great flow, dialog, acting and plot.  The other was the typical dumbbed down gore feast type thinking so typical of action movies.<br />
These two were reasonably well balanced with some of the pointless gore cut from the theatrical release, but other plot critical parts also cut.<br />
This movie looks like the former to me which is a good thing.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/69163/looks-like-an-interesting-setyup</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 01:14:44 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/69163.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 03:23:26 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>