<![CDATA[I'll be honest, I was hoping they would find a way to continue the threads they set up with "The Wolverine" Involving Ma]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Marvel/DC

Tsavo — 9 years ago(October 21, 2016 01:01 AM)

I'll be honest, I was hoping they would find a way to continue the threads they set up with "The Wolverine" Involving Mariko and his new connections there.
"From a phylogenetic perspective, we are all fish!"

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/69176/i-ll-be-honest-i-was-hoping-they-would-find-a-way-to-continue-the-threads-they-set-up-with-the-wolverine-involving-maRSS for NodeSat, 16 May 2026 16:03:21 GMTTue, 14 Apr 2026 03:24:09 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to I'll be honest, I was hoping they would find a way to continue the threads they set up with "The Wolverine" Involving Ma on Tue, 14 Apr 2026 03:24:12 GMT]]>Tsavo — 9 years ago(October 21, 2016 10:14 AM)

I have to agree! I really enjoyed it as a character piece, and appreciated it for giving us the first real glimpse at Logan as a character (specifically in the extended cut). I would really like to see some sort of statement about it at any rate. It just kind of sucked that they managed to finally get Wolvverine over Jean, which I thought went on far too long, and I did think that Mariko was an interesting character. if they ust drop that without a word, I'll be a bit bummed. Don't get me wrong, the trailer for this film looks amaing, and I might have to fly to Hong Kong ust to be sure that I get to watch it in cinemas, but I'll still be a little disappointed.
"From a phylogenetic perspective, we are all fish!"

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/713118https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/713118Tue, 14 Apr 2026 03:24:12 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I'll be honest, I was hoping they would find a way to continue the threads they set up with "The Wolverine" Involving Ma on Tue, 14 Apr 2026 03:24:11 GMT]]>The_Wolverine_X — 9 years ago(October 21, 2016 05:38 AM)

It was a damn good movie.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/713117https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/713117Tue, 14 Apr 2026 03:24:11 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I'll be honest, I was hoping they would find a way to continue the threads they set up with "The Wolverine" Involving Ma on Tue, 14 Apr 2026 03:24:11 GMT]]>Jeepster7 — 9 years ago(October 21, 2016 05:29 AM)

The Wolverine was freaking great. It's 3 times what the first dud of a movie should have been. This will be worth it if it matches the quality of that film.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/713116https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/713116Tue, 14 Apr 2026 03:24:11 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I'll be honest, I was hoping they would find a way to continue the threads they set up with "The Wolverine" Involving Ma on Tue, 14 Apr 2026 03:24:10 GMT]]>avlis-nec — 9 years ago(October 21, 2016 03:48 AM)

Im glad they did not.
The Wolverine
was freaking odd

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/713115https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/713115Tue, 14 Apr 2026 03:24:10 GMT