Nailed it right there. The OP was right!

That's a very telling rebuke of this movie.

Then it's right down your alley Phlegming. Geewe haven't seen much of you since this film has become a legitimate hit. I wonder why?
Plan?There ain't no plan!!

lololololololol
This movie is so bad
It doesn't even make sense

this garbage movie deserved all the hate critics gave it and this video is perfect proof of why this is so stupid.
Thank god she made it

That was fantastic.

Yep. I enjoyed it.
Good for a laugh.

lol she completely rips apart the logic of the movie.

My mistake. You're right. I should've caught that. Stupidity

You Tuber Nails the
Stupitidy
of SS
Oh the irony.
First I thought I would say a joke about Sodium and Hydrogen but NaH.

The comments section gave me cancer.
I Don't Hate Suicide Squad

See, women can be funny.

That was good.
It's that man again!!

Explaining something doesn't mean it works.
You can try to explain tornadocide all you want to, it's still a dumb f'ing scene.

Not explained but after some reflection (and perhaps some checking of related DC material) it becomes clear why

• it was necessary (for Waller) to not divulge the precise reasons for the mission, because otherwise it would give time for the team to evaluate whether it was worthwhile saving her or just themselves rather than take on an objectively real threat to all regardless of origin.
• it was recognized that without a complimentary military support team the SS would not probably successfully engage and destroy the threat facing them. First possible reason: It's the norm in many American action movies to involve a US military contingent because it serves as good copy/propaganda for the efforts of real world US military efforts directed at a US and global audience. Equally so, it's a popular meme in movies whereby "big firepower" is somewhat indicative of the "cavalry" coming to save the people. And more precisely its probably a quiet admission that it would not be believable to insert a group of crimes with mostly "small scale" powers into something akin to a warzone without military support. Their role is to act as a type of rapid leading attack force exploiting their aggressive tendencies and special tactics. No doubt this was also part of David Ayer "grounding the film in realism" and avoiding resorting to primarily superpowered action - not entirely sure though if this is a satisfying narrative strategy or not.
• it seems that Batman and Waller are on rather cool terms - he doesn't trust her nor her him. Maybe he has an idea about her ruthless nature towards human beings and how anyone may be disposable when necessary to her goals.

Was it explained why Waller's mission for the Squad was to save HER from enchantress when Enchantress is originally IN the squad?
Was it explained why Squad is accompanied by SWAT?
Was it explained why Waller doesn't ask Batman to help her?
DISCLAIMER: If the post above is stupid, explain my stupidity instead of name-calling.

Some stuff could stick.and was funny. But most of it was shown and or explained in the movie. Playing dumb to hate on a movie that you think is dumb.. Wow

The guy who ended up like the shark from Jaws

This message has been deleted.

Give the movie some credit. It also has a guy who can climb things.

So skip over the fact that some in the squad are meta humans and could take on superman as a team. Killer croc, enchantress, and el diablo could probably do do.some.damage.

This message has been deleted.

Suspension of belief or suspension of disbelief?

Accurate perhaps, funny, no. It's entertainment, people. When dealing with fantastical subject matter, suspension of belief is necessary.
Next she'll probably do one on Pete's Dragon