Seemed like it was a little more, like about 10-15 minutes, but I didn't time it or anything like that.

If that were the case, he never should've agreed to star in the thing if he was gonna bitch about the content later on. Or at least donate the money he was paid to the victims of the incident he referenced as his reason for bowing out of the promotion. He didn't seem to have a problem with the violent content when he collected his paycheck for it. What a hypocrite.

Agree. Could've gotten those same (albeit quality) minutes from any gruffy looking dude.
When we're thinking about our own brain, would that be a mental paradox??

If they HAD to go with a big-name actor, then they knew nobody would've seen this piece of crap otherwise.

Should have gone with a lessor known actor and took the budget way down.
The movie would still be the same either way.

He had his reasons. He thought this film was mindlessly violent.

LOL all for him to act like an idiot and not promote the film.

Where do you think $20M of their $28M budget went?