Did you even read the article? He didn't give blind praise to Charlie Cox. He even said he was a little odd and stiff in the first few episodes and didn't break into his role until afterwards.
Officially Canadian for 26 years. Never heard "aboot."

Perhaps any semi-literate could read it. Nobody who is literate would have written "You could have wrote [sic] 'I want to suck on Charlie Coxs[sic] Big Dick.'"
Furthermore, anyone who is literate would have been able to read the review and would have seen that the OP praised the supporting cast far more than he praised Charlie Cox, whose performance he described as "hit or miss." Apparently, reading comprehension is not Two Face's strong suit.
I disagree with the OP's assessment of the 2003 movie. I enjoyed the theatrical version, and, more recently, the director's cut. However, I think he wrote a good review of the Netflix series. A response like Two Face's merely displays his own shortcomings, not those of the OP.

Im pretty sure anyone can read "I want to suck on Charlie Coxs Big Dick". I dont see how literacy has anything to do with it.

Yes, but he's not a semi-literate maroon.

You could have wrote "I want to suck on Charlie Coxs Big Dick" and saved yourself some time.