<![CDATA[Too Bad CGI Wasn't Around Then]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Marvel/DC

Camelot_2000 — 14 years ago(October 27, 2011 07:50 PM)

They could've done a better job on creating Howard and made him more animate with facial expressions. You could tell he was nothing, but a big costume. He and Big Bird could've been cousins.
The more I study it, the greater the puzzle becomes.
The Golden Voyage of Sinbad

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/71551/too-bad-cgi-wasn-t-around-thenRSS for NodeTue, 12 May 2026 17:06:42 GMTTue, 14 Apr 2026 06:11:25 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Too Bad CGI Wasn't Around Then on Tue, 14 Apr 2026 06:11:27 GMT]]>IMDb User

This message has been deleted.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/730505https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/730505Tue, 14 Apr 2026 06:11:27 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Too Bad CGI Wasn't Around Then on Tue, 14 Apr 2026 06:11:27 GMT]]>ndga13 — 13 years ago(May 08, 2012 10:24 AM)

Maybe George Lucas will make a Special Edition Producers Cut for this movie. He could replace the Howard "puppet" with a CGI Howard. He could extend the Duckworld opening scenes. He should definitely redo the Dark Overlord monster during the climax with CGI. But most importantly he should overdub a "Nooooooo!!!!" as the other Dark Overlords are sent back to their world.
"I'm gonna be Richard Nixon in your ass"

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/730504https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/730504Tue, 14 Apr 2026 06:11:27 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Too Bad CGI Wasn't Around Then on Tue, 14 Apr 2026 06:11:26 GMT]]>rowla — 13 years ago(May 07, 2012 12:12 PM)

Yeah but with cgi, we would have been able to tell that he was nothing but a load of computer graphics.. (ala Garfield/Chipmunks). At with least practical effects, what we see is actually there.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/730503https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/730503Tue, 14 Apr 2026 06:11:26 GMT