<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Plot hole in the new issue of LXG (Century: 1969) SPOILER ALERT!]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Marvel/DC</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>Prof_Gotham</strong> — <em>14 years ago(August 29, 2011 05:03 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Am I not the only one who thought that at some point Allan and Orlando would have come across a story, urban myth whatever, about a woman in an insane asylum who didn't age?<br />
That's just my opinion.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/71585/plot-hole-in-the-new-issue-of-lxg-century-1969-spoiler-alert</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 19:09:27 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/71585.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 06:13:44 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Plot hole in the new issue of LXG (Century: 1969) SPOILER ALERT! on Tue, 14 Apr 2026 06:13:47 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Prof_Gotham</strong> — <em>14 years ago(September 14, 2011 08:14 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Minus being in a drugged/drunken stupor after pissing his pants.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/730759</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/730759</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 06:13:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Plot hole in the new issue of LXG (Century: 1969) SPOILER ALERT! on Tue, 14 Apr 2026 06:13:47 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>hollywood2012</strong> — <em>14 years ago(September 13, 2011 01:48 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I noticed that, too! I thought that was a nice touch. I really do hope this series gets rebooted, it would make an incredible pair of trilogies (I don't know what you call a 6-ogy, but it would have to be one.)<br />
OK, Rabbit. We like it. We like your plan.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/730758</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/730758</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 06:13:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Plot hole in the new issue of LXG (Century: 1969) SPOILER ALERT! on Tue, 14 Apr 2026 06:13:46 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>different-drummer</strong> — <em>14 years ago(September 12, 2011 08:06 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I liked how it echoed the ending of V2, with Alan sitting on his own feeling abandoned by Mina and the others.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/730757</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/730757</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 06:13:46 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Plot hole in the new issue of LXG (Century: 1969) SPOILER ALERT! on Tue, 14 Apr 2026 06:13:46 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Prof_Gotham</strong> — <em>14 years ago(September 08, 2011 04:57 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Don't get me wrong, I liked the downbeat ending and how it basically showed how helpless the League was without Mina but at the same time, I find it hard to believe that they wouldn't have heard<br />
something<br />
in those eight years.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/730756</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/730756</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 06:13:46 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Plot hole in the new issue of LXG (Century: 1969) SPOILER ALERT! on Tue, 14 Apr 2026 06:13:45 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>different-drummer</strong> — <em>14 years ago(September 08, 2011 04:20 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I wouldn't call it a plot hole, though it does strain credulity somewhat that they couldn't trace her in 8 years.<br />
Re Tom Riddle, I'm surprised they've not been sued by JK Rowling who is famously litigious and protective of her creations.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/730755</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/730755</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 06:13:45 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Plot hole in the new issue of LXG (Century: 1969) SPOILER ALERT! on Tue, 14 Apr 2026 06:13:45 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>hollywood2012</strong> — <em>14 years ago(September 07, 2011 01:44 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Well, the last sequence only took place a few years after the bulk of the story. I imagine that in LXG (Century: 2009) they'll address this.<br />
And did you totally lose your sh!t when you realized that Haddo becomes Voldemort? Because I totally lost my sh!t when I realized that Haddo becomes Voldemort. Hands down my favorite issue yet.<br />
OK, Rabbit. We like it. We like your plan.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/730754</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/730754</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 06:13:45 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>