<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[i not as good as the 90&#x27;s version but better then the 2008 version as far as the concept. if they were to make one of th]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Marvel/DC</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>chris_mac_cam</strong> — <em>15 years ago(September 04, 2010 01:44 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">i not as good as the 90's version but better then the 2008 version as far as the concept. if they were to make one of the two try losing some of the cgi and a little more art.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/71825/i-not-as-good-as-the-90-s-version-but-better-then-the-2008-version-as-far-as-the-concept-if-they-were-to-make-one-of-th</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 May 2026 03:14:35 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/71825.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 06:25:20 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>