<![CDATA[Remakes never take chances like they used to]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Film Art and Cinematography

𝙵𝚞𝚐𝚊𝚣𝚒. — 1 year ago(January 09, 2025 05:32 PM)

They change it just enough to piss off fans of the original, butbplay it relatively safe. They never take advantage of having CGI. Take the Nightmare on Elm Street remake for example. We live inna time where you could really create some realistic looking surreal dream worlds, but they missed that opportunity.
It would've been great to see a remake that takes on the style of the posters.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/72903/remakes-never-take-chances-like-they-used-toRSS for NodeThu, 14 May 2026 15:20:48 GMTTue, 14 Apr 2026 07:31:52 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Remakes never take chances like they used to on Tue, 14 Apr 2026 07:31:53 GMT]]>/.ㅤ — 1 year ago(January 09, 2025 07:18 PM)

You said in another post somewhere else at how we have so much media, "at our fingertips unlike before."
Now you are saying there is nothing good on?
There is tons of stuff than just remakes to watch.
My password is password.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/738722https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/738722Tue, 14 Apr 2026 07:31:53 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Remakes never take chances like they used to on Tue, 14 Apr 2026 07:31:53 GMT]]>𝙵𝚞𝚐𝚊𝚣𝚒. — 1 year ago(January 09, 2025 06:56 PM)

That's all they make these past couple decades.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/738721https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/738721Tue, 14 Apr 2026 07:31:53 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Remakes never take chances like they used to on Tue, 14 Apr 2026 07:31:52 GMT]]>/.ㅤ — 1 year ago(January 09, 2025 06:55 PM)

Then just don't watch remakes, dummy.
My password is password.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/738720https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/738720Tue, 14 Apr 2026 07:31:52 GMT