I wonder what she thinks she's acomplishing by all the name changes. It's weird and rather creepy, much like the things she posts.

Now it changed it's name again. Wow!

This message has been deleted.

I don't know what the troll thought she'd acomplish by "stealing" my name but anyone who reads these pages can tell that I'm not the Clooney Loon. They say imitation is form of flattery but I'd prefer she just got the psychiatric help she so desperately needs.

This message has been deleted.

You really shouldn't have stolen the real pauldouglas' name by just changing the numbers. Your garbage is still the same as your old posts.

A prime example of social media run by a hag fest from George Clooney's PR network. Nothing genuine, independent or organic.
Demented old crones who post as (party animal not!/ Joanna - a British senile 78 year old hag whose real name is Sylvia Cheevers or inbred trailer-trash donnamarie/ annemarie) are SO obvious and pathetic in their desperation to promote ugly Amal Alamuddin.
The George Clooney PR network who are got financial "incentives" from ugly Amal Alamuddin's money laundering Islamist arms dealer Ziad Takieddine via her mother Baria's celebrity bookings agency Globell.
Promoting a fake "marriage" to a deformed she male with a ton of caked on make up & obvious photoshop to the lowest resolution just to conceal how grotesque her features are
OBJECTIVE
: publicity to elevate a non-entity, underachiever loser lawyer with a speech impediment & delusions of grandeur to influential celebrity status .& stealth marketing revenue from gossip media outlets.
At almost 40, junior barrister Amal Alamuddin has never led nor won a case in court. Instead, on defence team of Lockerbie bomber Abdullah Senussi, linked to her arms dealer uncle
What a total mess they made of George Clooney's public image.

by ghostwriter_x 15 hours ago (Sat Feb 13 2016 00:39:35) Flag | Reply |
IMDb member since April 2011
What "shat" gave you a migraine, prefertoremainanonymous? You instigate this "Shat."
Prefertoremainanonymous - aka Lola by her PR network of intel shills who run George Clooney's social media.
-Here we go again! Now I am part of this shat! Clooney and his minstrels has done it again. What's next? I invented the nuclear bomb?
Clooney with his loser muslim wife trying to give away EVERYONE ELSE'S MONEY BUT HIS OWN!
ghostwriter go screeewed yourself! I am not biting!

This message has been deleted.

This message has been deleted.

pauldouglas-41263 DO NOT ENCOURAGE! Please don't The shat gives me a migraine.

What does the Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ), a British intelligence and security organisation responsible for providing signals intelligence (SIGINT) and information assurance to the British government and armed forces have to do with George Clooney?

This message has been deleted.

Don't you get tired of copying and pasting the same foolish things onto so many threads here? Are you incable of writting down your own thoughts? Then again, you're beyong stupid so I'd have very little interest in reading anything you have to say on your own as it would only be a reflection of your stupidity and insanity. So go on, continue passing off others words as your own, it couldn't be worse than whatever words you'd manage to stumble to string together,

This message has been deleted.

This message has been deleted.

Personally, I wouldn't be placing Clooney on the 'watch list' because of his wife (though it certainly warrants it) but because of Clooney himself. He is one of those super ultra liberal movie stars (like Affleck) that are the real threat to our safety in today's world. These bleeding hearts don't even know what they believe or stand for anymore and in the end it's a bit unnerving and worry some the way they place themselves in the pickle. Their (usually) noble, well intentional fight for liberty and equality for example same sex marriages, women's rights and freedom of speech and religion are good arguments worth fighting for. But then they get involved in the middle East and they end up on the side of the terrorists or terrorists in training, like the Syrian rebels for example or the Palestinians and their 'rights' or lack of. In this process though they end up supporting the very people who stand against everything they so ardently fight for. Therefore they place themselves in a weird almost laughable situation of contradiction as they support the people who hang homosexuals in the public square, kill women for educating themselves, massacre the unbelievers and Westerners, even their own Muslims who belong in the different following of Islam and have zero freedom of speech for those are murdered too. So, in the end, what/who do they think they are supporting, or do they take time to think at all? Being a liberal nowadays (or fanatic liberals bred largely in the brainless, clueless, luxury of Hollywood) seem to consist of being a spokespersons for a cause, any cause, for the sake of having a cause and creating more chaos and complains about all that is 'wrong' with our country that they seem not to love, care for or respect. It is enough to make one switch parties, honestly.

Again with the bull crap links? This is getting old. If you really want to convince anyone of your secret government plots you're going to have to step up your game there, cupcake.

This message has been deleted.

This message has been deleted.

This message has been deleted.

and that's all you have? Posting the same lame stories is not going to convince anyone.

This message has been deleted.

You mean like how you and your sockpuppets are trying to control this board?