<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Yet another WIN for Julianne, possibly better than the Oscar]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Julianne Moore</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>greatbritain1989</strong> — <em>11 years ago(February 25, 2015 03:26 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Two nods on my erotic thriller list. Fabulous work, Julianne!!<br />
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/list/ls073924189/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.imdb.com/list/ls073924189/</a><br />
Did anyone prefer Chloe to Body of Evidence. Have a look and comment!!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/77015/yet-another-win-for-julianne-possibly-better-than-the-oscar</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 18:07:33 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/77015.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 13:51:47 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Yet another WIN for Julianne, possibly better than the Oscar on Tue, 14 Apr 2026 13:51:49 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>greatbritain1989</strong> — <em>9 years ago(February 07, 2017 08:53 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Last chance to read my erotic thrillers chart. Check my lists.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/777665</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/777665</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 13:51:49 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Yet another WIN for Julianne, possibly better than the Oscar on Tue, 14 Apr 2026 13:51:49 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>greatbritain1989</strong> — <em>10 years ago(December 28, 2015 04:13 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Reminder.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/777664</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/777664</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 13:51:49 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Yet another WIN for Julianne, possibly better than the Oscar on Tue, 14 Apr 2026 13:51:48 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/777663</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/777663</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 13:51:48 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Yet another WIN for Julianne, possibly better than the Oscar on Tue, 14 Apr 2026 13:51:48 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>greatbritain1989</strong> — <em>10 years ago(July 18, 2015 10:41 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Surprised nobody has commented on my blog. Read it, I did it for YOU.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/777662</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/777662</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 13:51:48 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Yet another WIN for Julianne, possibly better than the Oscar on Tue, 14 Apr 2026 13:51:47 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>greatbritain1989</strong> — <em>11 years ago(March 05, 2015 01:07 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Proud of Julianne!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/777661</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/777661</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 13:51:47 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>