<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[I guess she should have been a little more adament about keeping parts but she&#x27;d been busy as Reese anyway.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Meg Ryan</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>katydb65</strong> — <em>9 years ago(November 04, 2016 04:30 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I guess she should have been a little more adament about keeping parts but she'd been busy as Reese anyway.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/77527/i-guess-she-should-have-been-a-little-more-adament-about-keeping-parts-but-she-d-been-busy-as-reese-anyway</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 10:04:00 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/77527.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 14:31:33 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>