<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[&#x27;Quintet&#x27; (1979)]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Robert Altman</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>IceboxMovies</strong> — <em>16 years ago(October 04, 2009 10:06 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">The frozen wasteland which serves as the backdrop for Quintet is like an all-you-can-eat dessert buffet for the eyes and the imagination. You cannot take your eyes off of it. This is a blindingly white, snowy tundra that stretches in two directions: in the South, there used to be seals to hunt, but no longer; and in the North, well nobody knows what's up there. And in between are the last remaining people on Earth, stranded in their own hellish limbo, with nothing left to live for in life other than to enact the violence merely alluded to in what appears to be everyone's favorite board game. This is a survival of the fittest story, set in a futuristic ice age where there is nothing but ice and snow everywhere. In short, it's my kind of movie.<br />
Robert Altman had a method for determining which of his films needed extra support. He knew that alongside those heavily lauded American multicharacter epics, there were other, more underrated films from his career that had somehow fallen off the face of the planet. They needed someone to lean on. Sometimes fans would go up to Altman and ask him which of his films were his favorite. He would answer them by, first, asking the fans which films of his they had liked the least. A couple of fans were reported to have mumbled, "Well, I didn't understand this Quintet thing", to which Altman would snap his finger and point: "That's my favorite movie."<br />
Quintet is the third installment in Altman's unofficial "surrealist" trilogy of the 1970's, a trilogy that began with Images (1972) and reached its peak with the incomparable 3 Women (1977). All three films are ghoulish minions spawned from Altman's rarely-seen dark side: with Images, he took a stab at the horror genre; with 3 Women, he redefined the meaning of uncertainty; and Quintet, lastly, was his interpretation of science fiction. If there are any noticeable differences, let it be said that the previous two films were about the psychological troubles experienced by women- wheras in Quintet, it is the men who spiral down into Freudian madness. But Quintet, like Images and 3 Women, was a box-office disaster, and there have even been (unconfirmed) stories of theaters promising moviegoers their money back in case they couldn't sit through the first 20 minutes. Why? Maybe the theater chains themselves considered the film to be one giant bore. Not one American soul could figure out what Altman was getting at with the film. At least with Images and 3 Women, the perplexity of the plot twists seemed intentional; Quintet was attacked by critics and audiences as confusing for all the wrong reasons.<br />
I must be the only one in the world who believes that Quintet is some kind of masterpiece. The screenplay by Altman, Frank Barhydt and Patricia Resnick is one that I would have happily directed myself had I been in Altman's shoes. Some charge that the film is too slow-paced, which may account for the accusations of supposed boredom; you could have fooled me, then, because I find that the film moves like a streak. In fact, I had to watch Quintet twice in order to fully comprehend the experience, and I ended up both enjoying and admiring the film even more on a second viewing. Maybe the popular opinion of disappointment with the film stems from the hard-pressed challenge of having to look at Altman tackle a genre like science fiction. The material is not unlb68ike that of Richard Matheson, so it's possible that those who don't understand the goofy delight of a gritty Matheson story won't buy into Altman's approach. "The thrill is just the magic of it- of making somebody sit in their chair for two hours and be interested or curious", Altman explains in the Making Of documentary now available on the film's DVD, although he admits that the film didn't provide the sort of experience that can be easily digested by audiences. "When we did it, nobody knew what it was."<br />
Altman bookends his film with shots of the tundra landscape. He begins Quintet with nothing but a white screen, tracking the camera alongside a lengthy barrier until we can just barely make out two blurry gray figures up ahead; and he ends the film with a long take depicting a single figure walking off into the far distance- off into nothing- disappearing into the blizzard. The beginning and ending of Quintet are the film's polar ice caps. Everything sandwiched inside is the last remaining ounce of civilization. The structure of the film is made to resemble that of the world.<br />
The Earth seen in Quintet is suffering from reverse global warming. In these dark ages, children are never born, and the dead become buzzard food for stray dogs. Trailing out from the mist is Essex (Paul Newman), a seal hunter with no aspirations and no future. In tow is his young wife, Vivia (Brigitte Fossey), the daughter of one of Essex' late hunting partners. She is the last pregnant woman alive, in a society where the women long so much for children that they begin acting like children themselves. Vivia, for</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/78810/quintet-1979</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 15:36:06 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/78810.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 16:31:10 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to &#x27;Quintet&#x27; (1979) on Tue, 14 Apr 2026 16:31:14 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>shepardjessica-1</strong> — <em>11 years ago(October 21, 2014 05:02 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Altman is my #4 director all-time, but this is one of my least favorites (after t1908wo viewings).  I worked on the set of CALIFORNIA SPLIT and Leon Ericksen was great, as was Altman.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/792833</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/792833</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 16:31:14 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to &#x27;Quintet&#x27; (1979) on Tue, 14 Apr 2026 16:31:13 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Scorpio_65</strong> — <em>14 years ago(February 23, 2012 08:12 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I've seen about 20 of Altman's films and, granted, there are none that I hate, but California Split and Buffalo Bill and the Indians would, IMO, rank among his painfully slowest and most boring that I've seen. I would also put MASH in that category (I seem to be in the minority on this as it seems to be cherished!).</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/792832</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/792832</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 16:31:13 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to &#x27;Quintet&#x27; (1979) on Tue, 14 Apr 2026 16:31:12 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>buby1987</strong> — <em>16 years ago(February 01, 2010 10:01 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">That seems to be a common sentiment.  Even people who didn't like the film admit that it made an impression.  Sometimes so-called failures are a lot more interesting than bland successes.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/792831</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/792831</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 16:31:12 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to &#x27;Quintet&#x27; (1979) on Tue, 14 Apr 2026 16:31:12 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>McGonigle</strong> — <em>16 years ago(January 12, 2010 08:38 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I wouldn't say I enjoyed it, but this was one of the most unforgettable films I've ever seen, so that's worth something. I haven't been able to psyche myself up to watch it a second time, though.<br />
I know I'm shouting, I like to shout.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/792830</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/792830</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 16:31:12 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to &#x27;Quintet&#x27; (1979) on Tue, 14 Apr 2026 16:31:11 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>buby1987</strong> — <em>16 years ago(October 18, 2009 06:42 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I saw it twice when it came out, and a few times on video, now on DVD.  Certainly a unique film, with minimalist plot and a frigid, lifeless atmosophere.  A film like this would never be made by a major studio today.  Worth a view.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/792829</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/792829</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 16:31:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to &#x27;Quintet&#x27; (1979) on Tue, 14 Apr 2026 16:31:10 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>franzkabuki</strong> — <em>16 years ago(October 17, 2009 12:52 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Its got an intriguing premise, but as an actual experience, it dont work at all imo. Its the only Altman film Ive seen so far thats actually boring  (although Streamers comes close) - and Ive seen some 20. Images and 3 Women are both great, but this ones got its head up its own ass way too deep and nothing particularly interesting emerges. I remember somebody wrote that by that point (1979) Altman had started to believe critics praising him too much - that hes this genius and all - and decided to go all deep and Bergmanian all of a sudden. With less than fascinating results. And I cant really agree that it looks great either - Id envisioned what wonders could be done with such an icy-snowy locale in terms of visuals before I saw it but then of course most of the film was spent behind closed doors, in rather drab conditions.<br />
Nice review though.<br />
"facts are stupid things" - Ronald Reagan</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/792828</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/792828</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 16:31:10 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>