<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[But says he&#x27;s not interested at the moment.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Tim Burton</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>Nathanred</strong> — <em>1 year ago(August 23, 2024 06:11 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">But says he's not interested at the moment.<br />
<a href="https://variety.com/2024/film/news/tim-burton-isnt-interested-comic-book-franchise-1236114249/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://variety.com/2024/film/news/tim-burton-isnt-interested-comic-book-franchise-1236114249/</a><br />
“At the moment, I would say no,” Burton tells Variety in a new interview. “I come at things from different points of view, so I would never say never to anything. But, at the moment, it’s not something I’d be interested in.”<br />
The filmmaker, promoting his new sequel “Beetlejuice Beetlejuice,” shares that he was afforded a certain creative freedom and faced relatively modest studio supervision during the 1988 production of “Batman” in England.<br />
“I was lucky because at that time, the word ‘franchise’ didn’t exist,” Burton says. “‘Batman’ felt slightly experimental at the time. … It deviated from what the perception [of a superhero movie] might be.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/79850/but-says-he-s-not-interested-at-the-moment</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 16:35:19 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/79850.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 18:02:13 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>