<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Return to roots?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — David Cronenberg</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>RiseUpMegalon</strong> — <em>10 years ago(November 01, 2015 10:14 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">So we're seeing many actors and directors trying to reboot and return to their properties that made them famous, and failing.. but I think Cronenberg could benefit with today's technology. They couldn't be remakes, but the same creepy creature type premises. That's if he still feels that. Many artists evolve and can't step backwards, but old school Cronenberg with today's capablities could be interesting.<br />
But then, do directors really get to control CGI like they do prosthetics? The sweatshops of Singapore would just ruin the fun <img src="https://filmglance.com/discuss/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f615.png?v=8570fb93240" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--confused" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=":/" alt="😕" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/80212/return-to-roots</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 20:48:50 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/80212.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 18:34:25 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Return to roots? on Tue, 14 Apr 2026 18:34:28 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>SteveDayreturns</strong> — <em>10 years ago(January 11, 2016 07:31 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">But it's nice to dream.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/804012</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/804012</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 18:34:28 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Return to roots? on Tue, 14 Apr 2026 18:34:27 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>preachcaleb</strong> — <em>10 years ago(November 17, 2015 08:47 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I agree. One of my favorite things about Cronenberg's work is watching him evolve.<br />
Can't stop the signal.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/804011</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/804011</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 18:34:27 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Return to roots? on Tue, 14 Apr 2026 18:34:27 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>RiseUpMegalon</strong> — <em>10 years ago(November 04, 2015 07:40 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Ehh.. maybe. I totally realize Cronenberg Sr has moved on. Not too excited about Brandon. Heirs rarely cone close.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/804010</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/804010</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 18:34:27 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Return to roots? on Tue, 14 Apr 2026 18:34:26 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>K_Sear</strong> — <em>10 years ago(November 04, 2015 07:37 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">That era is over and Cronenfans need to stop pining for it: Cronenberg Sr. isn't going back, nor should he.  "Old school Cronenberg with today's capabilities" is his son.  If you haven't seen it yet, you should check out Antiviral.  I'm interested to see what he does next if someone will give him some money.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/804009</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/804009</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 18:34:26 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>