<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Ok, so it&#x27;s totally beneath Mr. Dorn, but if it&#x27;s the only way we&#x27;ll see more Worf &amp; the project has a good script, dire]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Michael Dorn</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>leyenda61</strong> — <em>11 years ago(October 06, 2014 09:16 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Ok, so it's totally beneath Mr. Dorn, but if it's the only way we'll see more Worf &amp; the project has a good script, director, &amp; creatively uses a micro budget I say go for it. Worf has always been about exploring the character, rather than high budget cgi actiony stuff.<br />
Sent from my 13 year old P.O.S. Desktop</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/80506/ok-so-it-s-totally-beneath-mr-dorn-but-if-it-s-the-only-way-we-ll-see-more-worf-the-project-has-a-good-script-dire</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 11:22:00 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/80506.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 19:02:41 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>