That way, you bypass any legalities,
I take you don't quite know how the internet works (or law for that matter).
~
Not my circus, not my monkeys
~

Blocking someone is quite the opposite of being "whiny"
Not when the person has little to no reason to turn the other poster off.
I am Judge! Jury! and Executioner!

Blocking someone is quite the opposite of being "whiny"

You're the one who is being silly here. I wasn't trying to change any subject. All I did was bring up Greg Harrison's & the Haims' arguments regarding Feldman's book & subsequent interviews, regarding Corey's sexual abuse: He was only confronting
FELDMAN'S
role in his sexual abuse. He was not confronting his abusers as a whole!!!
Blocking me is only being whiney.
Who are you? Who? Who? Who? Who?

You are being silly. You completely ignored the evidence I posted, which completely negated your claims, and turned it into a jealousy thing to try to change the subject. I'm not discussing this further with you. Blocked.

I'm not being silly. This is exactly what Haim's family & friends all will tell you about Feldman: That he had always been jealous of him(Corey Haim).
b68
Who are you? Who? Who? Who? Who?

You're either ignorant, or pretending not to know about the following (in which Feldman was recorded, back in 1993, as having named the damn guy to police, which Radar has described as an "A-lister," clearly disqualifying Brascia):
http://www.deathandtaxesmag.com/304950/radar-online-police-audio-corey-feldman-naming-corey-haim-sex-abuse/
What are you going to say next? Feldman planted this story in 1993, to use almost 25 years later? Give me a break. We agreed that it's not Sheen, but you're just being silly.

Corey Feldman was jealous of Haim, according to his family & friends.
It was Haim who first brought up the fact that he had been raped on
The 2 Coreys
, but, only to challenge Feldman on the fact that he chose to be friends with the person who had raped him(Brascia).
Who are you? Who? Who? Who? Who?

In his book, he said many unsavory things about himself, and shared this tidbit about Haim. He didn't need to throw in a lie about a friend of two decades to "stay relevant." Further, other actors and actresses have said that they heard similar things about them (that they were passed around to pedophiles when young).
I don't know why people are suddenly trying to keep this all quiet and pin the blame on Brascia only. I don't know if Brascia is guilty or not, but I know Corey Feldman gains nothing by making this claim. He can get attention a million other ways.

This message has been deleted.

Would you believe an anonymous accusation on a message board? It would be pointless. One of those gossip rags speculated that it was Martin Sheen. Of course they put a disclaimer that it was b68just speculation but that should at least show that these media outlets
can
throw names out there without worrying about being sued.
And as far as that goes, would it really be wise for a guilty party to sue? It opens them up to deposition. Anyone familiar with the WM3 case? Terry Hobbs sued Natalie Pasdar of the Dixie Chicks for saying that he murdered those three boys. Natalie Pasdar used the lawsuit to depose Hobbs in an attempt to prove Hobbs was the murderer. In the end, Hobbs lost the suit and Pasdar never got the evidence, but it shows that suing someone over accusations can be dangerous if you are guilty. Seeing as there is a police recording and supposedly dozens of corroborating witnesses, I think the perp here would be scared as hell to sue.
I'd name him and hope he sued.

I'm talking about the "Hollywood mogul" who Feldman referred to. The one who assaulted him on the set of Lucas, who is supposedly in his 70s right now.

We've already got a direct name from Haim's actual real life friend: The perpetrator was Dominick Brascia.
Who are you? Who? Who? Who? Who?