Sheen would of only been 19 at the time, so no.

David Nicksayis a possible suspect. He was the one who produced Lucas.

It amazes me how some people still defend the guy. Sheen is one of the biggest scumbags in Hollywood.

It's not definite. Could mean he plied him with liquor and pot, not raped him.

beep
is pretty much confirmed as fact by now, isn't it?
When you combine this quote from Corey Feldman's memoir:
Within hours of our first meeting, we found ourselves talking about "Lucas", the film he made in the summer of 1985, the role I had wanted for myself. At some point during the filming, he explained an adult male convinced him that it was perfectly normal for older men and younger boys in the business to have sexual relations, that it was what all "guys do". So they walked off to a secluded area between two trailers, during a lunch break for the cast and crew, and Haim, innocent and ambitious as he was, allowed himself to be sodomized. [] [That man]
walks around, one of the most successful people in the entertainment industry, still making money hand over fist
with this older quote from him:
Well I have to be completely honest and say, I'm not a huge fan of Charlie Sheen. I don't make it my goal to ever talk badl16d0y in the press, we're all in it together, that's the way I look at it, but Charlie in particular,
especially the way that he's affected other people that I know point blank, Charlie and Corey started their careers pretty much together, and Corey fought for his entire life to recover from those early experiences and to get his life together

And Haim allegedly had a premature crush on the first assailant which made it worse emotionally for him. Charlie Sheen isn't that much older so a crush wouldn't have been unnatural.

who knew. I saw lucas a few years ago and had no idea charlie sheen raped that little kid