<![CDATA[Incredibly versatile, Yet often had that same voice / accent]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — John Hurt

GenoWashingline — 9 years ago(January 28, 2017 04:23 PM)

He was a truly wonderful actor, yet for a guy who is knkwn for a huge range, it's odd that there is a definite 'John Hurt' voice.
Like Sean Connery in all his movies.
Not insulting the guy, just unusual I think.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/81849/incredibly-versatile-yet-often-had-that-same-voice-accentRSS for NodeWed, 13 May 2026 05:42:54 GMTTue, 14 Apr 2026 21:25:50 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Incredibly versatile, Yet often had that same voice / accent on Tue, 14 Apr 2026 21:25:51 GMT]]>IMDb User

This message has been deleted.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/819826https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/819826Tue, 14 Apr 2026 21:25:51 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Incredibly versatile, Yet often had that same voice / accent on Tue, 14 Apr 2026 21:25:51 GMT]]>black_mass-65596 — 9 years ago(January 28, 2017 08:29 PM)

Younger actors like Gary Oldman, Daniel Day Lewis and Johnny Depp were afforded the opportunity to play vastly different roles, but "versatility" wasn't a thing back when Hurt started to happen in movies. You had your screen persona and that was that (think Bogey, Stewart, Monroe). Hurt did very well within his given parameters: to compare him to Sean Connery is a joke.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/819825https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/819825Tue, 14 Apr 2026 21:25:51 GMT