<![CDATA[He was a truly wonderful actor, yet for a guy who is knkwn for a huge range, it's odd that there is a definite 'John Hur]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — John Hurt

GenoWashingline — 9 years ago(January 28, 2017 04:23 PM)

He was a truly wonderful actor, yet for a guy who is knkwn for a huge range, it's odd that there is a definite 'John Hurt' voice.
Like Sean Connery in all his movies.
Not insulting the guy, just unusual I think.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/81850/he-was-a-truly-wonderful-actor-yet-for-a-guy-who-is-knkwn-for-a-huge-range-it-s-odd-that-there-is-a-definite-john-hurRSS for NodeSat, 16 May 2026 11:19:06 GMTTue, 14 Apr 2026 21:25:52 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to He was a truly wonderful actor, yet for a guy who is knkwn for a huge range, it's odd that there is a definite 'John Hur on Tue, 14 Apr 2026 21:25:53 GMT]]>IMDb User

This message has been deleted.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/819829https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/819829Tue, 14 Apr 2026 21:25:53 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to He was a truly wonderful actor, yet for a guy who is knkwn for a huge range, it's odd that there is a definite 'John Hur on Tue, 14 Apr 2026 21:25:52 GMT]]>black_mass-65596 — 9 years ago(January 28, 2017 08:29 PM)

Younger actors like Gary Oldman, Daniel Day Lewis and Johnny Depp were afforded the opportunity to play vastly different roles, but "versatility" wasn't a thing back when Hurt started to happen in movies. You had your screen persona and that was that (think Bogey, Stewart, Monroe). Hurt did very well within his given parameters: to compare him to Sean Connery is a joke.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/819828https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/819828Tue, 14 Apr 2026 21:25:52 GMT