<![CDATA[What's the closest he's come to 'mainstream?']]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Jim Jarmusch

filmmagnet — 12 years ago(May 31, 2013 07:42 PM)

My personal opinion would be Dead Man, but some audiences would be turned off that because it's in b&w, so possibly the one with the largest potential audience would be Ghost Dog.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/81926/what-s-the-closest-he-s-come-to-mainstreamRSS for NodeFri, 15 May 2026 05:16:35 GMTTue, 14 Apr 2026 21:32:34 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to What's the closest he's come to 'mainstream?' on Tue, 14 Apr 2026 21:32:35 GMT]]>TimBur77 — 12 years ago(October 18, 2013 12:49 PM)

I remember a lot of talk in magazines like Variety & Hollywood Reporter back in the day when he cast Winona Ryder in Night On Earth. They kept calling that his attempt at going mainstream.
http://bat115.hubpages.com/

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/820468https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/820468Tue, 14 Apr 2026 21:32:35 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to What's the closest he's come to 'mainstream?' on Tue, 14 Apr 2026 21:32:35 GMT]]>PattyGJones — 12 years ago(July 11, 2013 07:57 PM)

Actually, filmmagnet, IMO putting the words "mainstream" and "Jarmusch" together is an oxymoron. They don't belong in the same sentence, but if you stretch Ghost Dog wide enough, I suppose you could call it "psychedelic mainstream." Don't you agree, BTW, that Dead Man was much better in black 'n' white than it would have been in color?
I'm only in Show Biz by injection

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/820467https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/820467Tue, 14 Apr 2026 21:32:35 GMT